Volume 44 Issue 1
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GENG Qingqiao, WANG Yu, RAO Zonghao, CUI Shu. A Study on the Share Rate of High-capacity Public Transportation on the Airport Landside Based on Mixed Logit Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(1): 170-180. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2026.01.015
Citation: GENG Qingqiao, WANG Yu, RAO Zonghao, CUI Shu. A Study on the Share Rate of High-capacity Public Transportation on the Airport Landside Based on Mixed Logit Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(1): 170-180. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2026.01.015

A Study on the Share Rate of High-capacity Public Transportation on the Airport Landside Based on Mixed Logit Model

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2026.01.015
  • Received Date: 2025-12-29
    Available Online: 2026-08-28
  • Scientifically predicting the share rate of high-capacity public transportation on the airport landside can provide quantitative support for the scale and capacity allocation of landside transportation facilities. Existing methods often have difficulty effectively depicting the significant differences in factors such as travel time value, travel purpose, and tolerance for transfers among travelers. Prediction results usually have issues such as being biased towards the average and lacking accuracy. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of public transportation passenger flow, this study takes into account the individual heterogeneity of travelers and develops a mixed logit generalized cost (MLGC) method for public transportation share rate by combining the mixed logit (ML) model with the generalized cost model. The fuzzy c-means (FCM) algorithm is used to select travel duration, average transfer times, and average waiting time as features. Based on the elbow rule, landside travelers are clustered into three heterogeneous groups. Taking travel time and travel cost as random variables, the parameters are classified into 4 specific attribute parameters according to private mode, rail transit, airport bus, and airport shuttle bus. Each variable is processed for binary classification. Meanwhile, elements such as perception of travel, waiting perception, and crowded environment are incorporated into the generalized cost function to construct a transfer impedance coefficient that includes spatial semantics. In addition, a three-level testing system was established, and model comparison and verification were carried out based on the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and log-likelihood values. Taking the Capital Airport as the empirical object, the model is calibrated using 2 067 valid questionnaires. The results showed that the McFadden value of the MLGC model reached 0.255, the fitting coefficient R2 is 0.924, and the log-likelihood value and AIC perform better than others. Sensitivity analysis indicates that when the train interval is reduced by 70%, the share rate increases to 26%, and when the transfer travel time is reduced by 90%, the overall share rate of public transportation exceeds private transportation. Moderately lowering ticket prices could significantly enhance the competitiveness of rail transit. The MLGC model can effectively reveal the influencing mechanism of the impact of airport landside public transportation choices. Reasonable train intervals, optimized ticket pricing mechanisms, and convenient transfer conditions can significantly increase the share rate of public transportation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    路尧. 大型机场旅客城市空间分布预测与交通方式选择行为研究[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2019.

    LU Y. Research on spatial distribution prediction and ground access mode choice of large airports in cites[D]. Beijing: Beijing University Of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    苏国威. 机场航站楼到达层地面交通换乘效率评价及优化研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林电子科技大学, 2023.

    SU G W. Research on evaluation and optimization of ground traffic transfer efficiency on arrival floor of airport terminal[D]. Guilin: Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    GHADER S, CARRION C, TANG L, et al. A copula-based continuous cross-nested logit model for tour scheduling in activity-based travel demand models[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2021, 145: 324-341. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.001
    [4]
    罗红双, 张杰. 大型空港综合客运枢纽陆侧交通规划布局研究综述[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2018, 16(4): 93-100.

    LUO H S, ZHANG J. Review of planning and layout of large airport integrated passenger hub landside traffic[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2018, 16(4): 93-100. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    罗谦, 李琦, 文涛, 等. 机场到港旅客换乘时间效率评价指标优选[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2022, 48(12): 1-9.

    LUO Q, LI Q, WEN T, et al. Optimization of transfer time efficiency evaluation index for airport arriving passengers[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022, 48(12): 1-9. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    边扬, 贾大智, 冯笑凡, 等. 北京大兴国际机场陆侧交通客流特征研究[J]. 城市交通, 2022, 20(4): 63-69.

    BIAN Y, JIA D Z, FENG X F, et al. Characteristics of landside passenger flow of Beijing Daxing international airport[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2022, 20(4): 63-69. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    TAM M L, LAM W H K, LO H P. The impact of travel time reliability and perceived service quality on airport ground access mode choice[J]. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2011(4): 49-69.
    [8]
    MAMDOOHI A R, SAFFARZADE M, TAHERPOUR A, et al. Modeling air passengers'ground access mode choice: a case study of IKIA[J]. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, 2012, (2): 147-152.
    [9]
    HARVEY G. Study of airport access mode choice[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1986, 112: 525-545. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1986)112:5(525)
    [10]
    王爱云. 机场轨道交通客流预测问题研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2014.

    WANG A Y. Study on passenger volume forecasting of airport rail transit[D]. Xi'an: Chang'an University, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    郭桐君. 轨道交通机场线规划方案对机场陆侧交通分担率的影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2020.

    GUO T J. Impact of rail transit airport line planning scheme on airport ground access modal share[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2020. (in Chinese).
    [12]
    葛红景. 机场陆侧交通一体化发展水平评价研究[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2023.

    GE H J. Study on evaluation of the development level for airport landside transportation[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    ZAIDAN E, ABULIBDEH A. Modeling ground access mode choice behavior for Hamad international airport in the 2022 FIFA World Cup city, Doha, Qatar[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2018, 73: 32-45.
    [14]
    LURKIN V, GARROW L A, HIGGINS M J, et al. Accounting for price endogeneity in airline itinerary choice models: an application to continental U. S. markets[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 100: 228-246. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.007
    [15]
    MURAKAMI J, MATSUI Y, KATO H. Airport rail links and economic productivity: evidence from 82 cities with the world's 100 busiest airports[J]. Transport Policy, 2016, 52: 89-99. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.009
    [16]
    FU J, LIN H, NIU Y, et al. Share ratio change of public transport in airport landside under the background of car population rapid increase: a case of Shanghai Pudong international airport[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, 25: 92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.384
    [17]
    周悦, 江欣国, 付川云, 等. 基于混合Logit模型的出租车超速者运营因素分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21 (3): 229-236.

    ZHOU Y, JIANG X G, FU C Y, et al. Operational factors analysis for taxi speeders using mixed logit model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(3): 229-236. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    朱宇婷, 戎亚萍, 赵欣苗. 换乘效率对城市轨道交通分担率的影响研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(2): 35-40.

    ZHU Y T, RONG Y P, ZHAO X M. Impact of transfer efficiency on the market share of urban rail transit[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2017, 17(2): 35-40. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    李颖, 赵莉, 赵祥模, 等. 基于大货车GPS数据的轨迹相似性度量有效性研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2): 146-157.

    LI Y, ZHAO L, ZHAO X M, et al. Effectiveness of trajectory similarity measures based on truck GPS data[J]. China Journal of Highway Transportation, 2020, 33(2): 146-157.
    [20]
    欧阳杰, 孙铭扬, 朱长青, 等. 大型枢纽机场航站楼港湾区运行程序优化方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2025, 43(2): 109-118. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.02.012

    OUYANG J, SUN M Y, ZHU C Q, et al. A study on optimization of operation procedures in the cul-de-sac area of terminals in large hub airports [J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(2): 109-118. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.02.012
    [21]
    张姚, 曹振宇. 考虑换乘站点时间权重的公交时刻表优化[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2020, 18(1): 77-82.

    ZHANG Y, CAO Z Y. Optimization model for public transport timetable with the time weight of transfer station[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2020, 18(1): 77-82. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    ALHUSSEIN S N. Analysis of ground access modes choice King Khaled international airport, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2011, 19: 1361-1367 doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.07.007
    [23]
    程小慷, 曹誉丹, 崔宇婕. 基于改进PSO的离港航班绿色滑行路径优化[J]. 航空计算技术, 2023, 53(3): 25-29.

    CHENG X K, CAO Y D, CUI Y J. Green taxi path optimization of departing flights based on improved PSO algorithm[J]. Aeronautical Computing Technique, 2023, 53(3): 25-29. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (45) PDF downloads(6) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return