Volume 44 Issue 1
Feb.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHAN Yixue, ZHANG Guilu, WEN Jianghui. A LSTM-BN Based Model for Real-time Vehicle Collision Risk Prediction[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(1): 52-61. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2026.01.005
Citation: ZHAN Yixue, ZHANG Guilu, WEN Jianghui. A LSTM-BN Based Model for Real-time Vehicle Collision Risk Prediction[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(1): 52-61. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2026.01.005

A LSTM-BN Based Model for Real-time Vehicle Collision Risk Prediction

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2026.01.005
  • Received Date: 2025-09-24
    Available Online: 2026-08-28
  • The development of vehicle-to-infrastructure cooperation (V2I) technology enables real-time dynamic information interaction between humans, vehicles, and roads, providing technical support for real-time vehicle collision risk prediction. Current models for predicting vehicle collision risk have limitations in capturing dynamic features and performing uncertainty inference. Thus, a two-layer progressive model based on long short-term memory-Bayesian network (LSTM-BN) is proposed. The LSTM-BN model utilizes LSTM at the bottom layer to capture the temporal evolution characteristics of vehicle states by setting a 0.1 s sampling window. At the top layer, the model performs probabilistic inference of collision risk through the BN. Based on data from naturalistic driving experiments in Wuhan, the time-to-collision (TTC) index is used to define and quantify the collision risk of vehicles (cars). This process yields 25, 826, 19, 344, and 4, 051 frames of no-risk, low-risk, and high-risk data, respectively. After preliminarily determining the variables affecting collision risk, the decision tree method is employed to extract key causal features from the dimensions of driver-vehicle-road. Interaction indicators, such as driver proficiency, speed difference, road type, and headway, are further excavated and characterized to reflect the non-linear coupling relationships among multi-dimensional factors. A Bayesian network reflecting these coupling relationship indicators is then constructed to evaluate the current vehicle collision risk. On this basis, to compensate for the deficiency of static probabilistic models in sequential prediction, LSTM is used to predict vehicle state variables. These variables are then mapped into the BN to infer the collision probability at the next time step. Through the above steps, the model achieves a precise prediction of real-time vehicle collision risk under dynamic evolution. To verify the effectiveness of the proposed model, its prediction performance is evaluated from four aspects: robustness, accuracy, timeliness, and complexity. Results from comparative modeling indicate that the LSTM-BN model achieves the highest accuracy at 91%. This performance is 7% and 12% higher than the accuracies of the support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF) models, respectively. Furthermore, its index fluctuations across different sampling periods are all below 0.1, demonstrating strong robustness.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘怿轩, 张慧永, 王猛, 等. 跟驰自动驾驶车时人驾车行为研究: 实证与建模[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2023, 21 (6): 14-28。

    LIU Y X, ZHANG H Y, WANG M, et al. Analyzing human driving behavior when following autonomous vehicle: real vehicle testing and modeling[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2023, 21(6): 14-28. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    WEN J H, WU C Z, ZHANG R Y, et al. Rear-end collision warning of connected automated vehicles based on a novel stochastic local multivehicle optimal velocity model[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 148: 105800.
    [3]
    MINDERHOUD M. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2001, 33(1): 89-97.
    [4]
    ZENG Q, WANG Q, ZHANG K, et al. Analysis of the injury severity of motor vehicle-pedestrian crashes at urban intersections using spatiotemporal logistic regression models[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2023, 189: 107119.
    [5]
    FOUNTAS G, FONZONE A, GHARAVI N, et al. The joint effect of weather and lighting conditions on injury severities of single-vehicle accidents[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2020, 27: 100124. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2020.100124
    [6]
    朱冰, 朴奇, 赵健, 等. 基于路面附着系数估计的汽车纵向碰撞预警策略[J]. 汽车工程, 2016, 38(4): 446-452.

    ZHU B, PU Q, ZHAO J, et al. Vehicle longitudinal collision warning strategy based on road adhesive coefficient estimation[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2016, 38(4): 446-452. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    ZHENG L, SAYED T, ESSA M. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of the non-stationary traffic conflict extremes for crash estimation[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2019, 23: 100100. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2019.100100
    [8]
    GU R F, SONG P L, SZE N N, et al. A semi-parameter copula model for vehicle damage severity in lane-changing related crashes[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2025, 214: 107979.
    [9]
    LI R, PEREIRA F C, BEN-AKIVA M E, et al. Competing risk mixture model and text analysis for sequential incident dura- tion prediction[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2015, 24: 74-85.
    [10]
    LEE J Y, ABDEL-ATY M, CAI Q, et al. Effects of emergency medical services times on traffic injury severity: a random effects ordered probit approach[J]. Traffic Injury Prevention, 2018(6): 1-19.
    [11]
    GAO X W, JIANG X K, HAWORTH J, et al. Uncertainty-aware probabilistic graph neural networks for road-level traffic crash prediction[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 208: 107801.
    [12]
    PUNIA D, KUMAR R. A YOLOv3-powered edge computing technique for real-time rear-end collision prediction in autonomous vehicles[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2025: 113981.
    [13]
    XIONG X X, CHEN L, LIANG J. A new framework of vehicle collision prediction by combining SVM and HMM[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2018, 19 (3): 699-710. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2699191
    [14]
    ZHU J, MA Y, LOU Y. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: a real-time risk assessment approach[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 166: 106546。
    [15]
    姚志洪, 郝慧君, 巫雪梅, 等. 考虑自动驾驶的混合交通流路段阻抗函数[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2021, 19(4): 1-12.

    YAO Z H, HAO H J, WU X M, et al. Cost function of mixed traffic flow with autonomous driving[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2021, 19(4): 1-12. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    何仁, 赵晓聪, 王建强. 人-车-路交互下的驾驶人风险响应度建模[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(9): 236-250.

    HE R, ZHAO X C, WANG J Q. Modeling of driving risk response under human-vehicle-road interaction[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(9): 236-250. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    OVIEDO-TRESPALACIOS O, AFGHARI A P, HAQUE M M. A hierarchical Bayesian multivariate ordered model of distracted drivers'decision to initiate risk-compensating behaviour[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2020, 26: 100121. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2020.100121
    [18]
    MEGIAS-ROBLES A, SANCHEZ-LOPEZ M, FERNANDEZ-BERROCAL P. The relationship between self-reported ability emotional intelligence and risky driving behaviour: consequences for accident and traffic ticket rate[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 174: 106760.
    [19]
    伊轩轩, 潘婷, 贺世明. 城市隧道边墙对不同车道驾驶人的行为影响研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2025, 43(3): 66-73. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.03.007

    YI X X, PAN T, HE S M. A study on the influence of side wall effect of urban tunnel on driver's eye movement and behavior characteristics[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(3): 66-73. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.03.007
    [20]
    WANG G, ZHANG J, KONG X. Study on passenger comfort based on human-bus-road coupled vibration[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(9): 3254. doi: 10.3390/app10093254
    [21]
    WANG J, LIU K, LI H. LSTM-based graph attention network for vehicle trajectory prediction[J]. Computer Networks, 2024, 248: 110477. doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110477
    [22]
    WU J B, WEN H Y, QI W W. A new method of temporal and spatial risk estimation for lane change considering conventional recognition defects[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 148: 105796.
    [23]
    ITOH M, INAGAKI T. Design and evaluation of steering protection for avoiding collisions during a lane change[J]. Ergonomics, 2014, 57(3): 361-373. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.848474
    [24]
    LARRANAGA P, KARSHENAS H, BIELZA C, et al. A re-view on evolutionary algorithms in Bayesian network learning and inference tasks[J]. Information Sciences, 2013, 233: 109. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.051
    [25]
    YANG M, ZHANG B, WANG T, et al. Vehicle interactive dynamic graph neural network-based trajectory prediction for internet of vehicles[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(22): 35777-35790. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3362433
    [26]
    张兰芳, 王淑丽, 陈程, 等. 基于自然驾驶数据的高速公路出口区换道风险模型[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 47 (10): 1446-1453.

    ZHANG L F, WANG S L, CHEN C, et al. Lane-change risk model of freeway off-ramp areas based on natural driving data[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science), 2019, 47 (10): 1446-1453. (in Chinese)
    [27]
    LI K, WANG S, CONG R. Game dynamics of route choice in heterogenous population[J]. Physics Letters A, 2022, 421: 127775. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127775
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (76) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return