Volume 43 Issue 6
Dec.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Junjie, YI Wenzheng, LEI Li, TIAN Pengcheng, ZHANG Aihua. A Causal Correlations Analysis with Multi-sample Controlled Flight Into Terrain Incidents[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 67-75. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.007
Citation: LIU Junjie, YI Wenzheng, LEI Li, TIAN Pengcheng, ZHANG Aihua. A Causal Correlations Analysis with Multi-sample Controlled Flight Into Terrain Incidents[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 67-75. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.007

A Causal Correlations Analysis with Multi-sample Controlled Flight Into Terrain Incidents

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.007
  • Received Date: 2024-11-24
    Available Online: 2026-03-13
  • To address the research gap regarding the causal correlations among incidents with varying consequence severities, this study adopts a Safety-Ⅱ perspective and takes controlled flight into terrain (CFIT), a high-risk aviation accident category, as the research object to analyze the causal factors and the interrelationships across samples with distinct outcome levels. A total of 128 CFIT accident investigation reports from the Aviation Safety Network (ASN) and 354 voluntary reports from the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) are selected as the analytical sample. Guided by the threat and error management (TEM) model, a systematic analysis is conducted to identify latent conditions, threats, flight crew errors, undesired aircraft states, and countermeasures inherent in the sampled accidents, which resulted in the identification of 3 367 causal factors and 2 169 causal-temporal relationships. Following semantic analysis and integration of these relationships, a Bayesian network (BN) model is constructed, resulting in an accident evolution network model comprising 46 BN nodes. Association rule mining is employed to compute conditional probabilities and inter-node correlations, so as to delineate the high-probability causal chains of the samples. Results demonstrate that: ①the primary high-risk pathway leading to CFIT accidents is: operational pressure → flight crew fatigue → loss of situational awareness → incorrect altimeter setting → aircraft deviation from the intended altitude profile. ②When negative factors including flight crew fatigue (accounting for 57% of the identified negative factors) and inadequate management by airlines/regulatory authorities (17%) are present, the probability of CFIT accidents increases by 24%. ③From the Safety-Ⅱ perspective, when positive factors, such as aviation system response measures (with an effectiveness rate of 78%) and the execution of recovery actions (84%) take effect, the probability of a stable approach is enhanced by 34%, thereby significantly mitigating the risk of CFIT occurrences.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    IATA. IATA controlled flight into terrain accident analysis report 2008-2017 data[R]. Montreal, Canada: International Air Transport Association, 2018.
    [2]
    ICAO. Celebrating TAWS 'Saves': But lessons still to be learnt[EB/OL]. (2006-06-29)[2024-10-01]. https://www.icao.int/safety/implementation/lists/library1/public.aspx.
    [3]
    ICAO. Annual ICAO Safety Report[R/OL]. (2023-08-23)[2023-10-14]. https://www.icao.int/safety/Pages/Safety-Report.aspx.
    [4]
    刘清贵. 韩亚航空214航班事故解析[J]. 中国民用航空, 2013(8): 27-28.

    LIU Q G. What Asiana airlines flight 214 accident tells us[J]. China Civil Aviation, 2013(8): 27-28. (in Chinese).
    [5]
    KELLY D, EFTHYMIOU M. An analysis of human factors in fifty controlled flight into terrain aviation accidents from 2007 to 2017[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2019, 69: 155-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.009
    [6]
    王洁宁, 钟彬. 人为差错导致的可控飞行撞地风险研究[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2019, 37(3): 38-43.

    WANG J N, ZHONG B. CFIT risk caused by human errod[J]. Journal of Civl Aviaiton University of China, 2019, 37 (3): 38-43. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    GUO C, SUN Y, SU S, et al. Risk assessment method for controlled flight into terrain of airlines based on QAR data[J]. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 2023, 95 (8): 1184-1193. doi: 10.1108/AEAT-10-2022-0269
    [8]
    孙瑞山, 占欣. 基于ISM—CRITIC法的通用航空可控飞行撞地影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(1): 129-135.

    SUN R S, ZHAN X. Analysis on influence factors of controlled flight into terrain of general aviation based on ISM-CRITIC method[J]. Joural of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(1): 129-135. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    魏燕明, 甘旭升, 游雯雯, 等. 基于ISM模型的可控飞行撞地诱因关系分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(2): 172-176.

    WEI Y M, GAN S X, YOU W W, et al. Inducement relationship analysis of controlled flight into terrain based on ISM model[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2018, 43(2): 172-176. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    MENG B, LU N. A hybrid model integrating HFACS and BN for analyzing human factors in CFIT accidents[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9(11): 711. doi: 10.3390/aerospace9110711
    [11]
    张晓全, 吴贵锋. 功能共振事故模型在可控飞行撞地事故分析中的应用[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2011, 7(4): 65-70.

    ZHANG X Q, WU G F. Application of FRAM model in CFIT accident analysis[J]. Joumal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 7(4): 65-70. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    汪磊, 孙瑞山. CFIT事故中的人为因素[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2007(增刊1): 80-82.

    WANG L, SUN R S. Human factors in CFIT accidents[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2007(S1): 80-82. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    杜尹岚. 基于贝叶斯网络的CFIT事件量化分析[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2021.

    DU Y L. Quantitative analysis of CFIT events based on Bayesian network[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    李冰滔. 基于贝叶斯网络模型的可控飞行撞地研究[D]. 广汉: 中国民用航空飞行学院, 2025.

    LI B T. Controlled flight into terrain study based on Bayesian network modeling[D]. Guanghan: Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2025. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    杜红兵, 王雪莉. 基于贝叶斯网络的可控飞行撞地事故原因分析方法[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2009, 9(5): 136-139.

    DU H B, WANG X L. Cause analysis of the controlled flight bumping into terrain based on the Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2009, 9(5): 136-139. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    HOLLNAGEL E. Safety-Ⅰ and Safety-Ⅱ: the past and future of safety management[M]. London: CRC press, 2014.
    [17]
    KUHN K D. Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 87: 105-122. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.12.018
    [18]
    DNM Safety. From Safety-Ⅰ to Safety-Ⅱ: a white paper[EB/OL]. (2022-05-21)[2025-01-16]. https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/2437.pdf.
    [19]
    American Airlines. Trailblazers into Safety-ll: American airlines' learning and improvement team[EB/OL]. (2020-04-23)[2025-01-16]. https://skybrary.aero/articles/trailblazers-safety-ii-american-airlines-learning-and-improvement-team.
    [20]
    American Airlines. Charting a new approach: what goes well and why at American airlines[EB/OL]. (2020-04-23)[2025-01-16]. https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/AA%20LIT%20White%20Paper%20II%20-%20SEP%202021.pdf.
    [21]
    BAO M Y, DING S T. Individual-related factors and management-related factors in aviation maintenance[C]. 3rd International Symposium on Aircraft Airworthiness, Toulouse, France: ISAA, 2014.
    [22]
    刘俊杰, 张丽娟. 飞行疲劳事件语义网络分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2016, 26(1): 34-39.

    LIU J J, ZHANG L J. Semantic network analysis of flight fatigue events[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2016, 26(1): 34-39. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    GAO Y, HAO Y, WANG S, et al. The dynamics between voluntary safety reporting and commercial aviation accidents[J]. Safety Science, 2021, 141.
    [24]
    袁乐平, 张文东, 赵力梵, 等. 基于TEM模型的民航不安全事件关联规则挖掘与分析[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2022, 18(10): 31-36.

    YUAN L P, ZHANG W D, ZHAO L F, et al. Mining and analysis of association rules in civil aviation unsafe incidents based on TEM model[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2022, 18(10): 31-36. (in Chinese)
    [25]
    ICAO. Threat and error management(TEM)in air traffic control[EB/OL]. (2005-10-06)[2024-10-02]. https://flightsafety.org/files/tem_icao_10-05.pdf.
    [26]
    IATA. IATA safety report 2022[EB/OL]. (2023-03-07)[2024-10-01]. https://www.iata.org/en/pressroom/2023-releases/2023-03-07-01/.
    [27]
    LI M, WANG D, SHAN H. Risk assessment of mine ignition sources using fuzzy Bayesian network[J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2019, 125: 297-306. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.03.029
    [28]
    ZHANG C, LIU C, LIU H, et al. Incorporation of pilot factors into risk analysis of civil aviation accidents from 2008 to 2020: a data-driven bayesian network approach[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(1): 9.
    [29]
    JI C, SU X, QIN Z, et al. Probability analysis of construction risk based on noisy-or gate Bayesian networks[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022, 217: 107974.
    [30]
    ICAO. Procedures for air navigation services - training - (Doc 9868 3rd Edition)[EB/OL]. (2023-01-31)[2024-10-01]. https://standart.aero/en/icao/book/doc-9868-training-en-cons.
    [31]
    KHATWA R, ROELEN A L C. Controlled flight into terrain (CFIT)accidents of air taxi, regional & major operators[M]. Amsterdam: CRC Press, 2020.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(9)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (14) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return