Volume 43 Issue 6
Dec.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CAI Jing, LI Jianping, NIU Yufa, LI Yue, DAI Xuan. An Analysis and Prediction Model of Aircraft Landing States on Wet Runways with Crosswind Based on Taxiing Dynamics Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 54-66. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.006
Citation: CAI Jing, LI Jianping, NIU Yufa, LI Yue, DAI Xuan. An Analysis and Prediction Model of Aircraft Landing States on Wet Runways with Crosswind Based on Taxiing Dynamics Model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 54-66. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.006

An Analysis and Prediction Model of Aircraft Landing States on Wet Runways with Crosswind Based on Taxiing Dynamics Model

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.006
  • Received Date: 2025-07-26
    Available Online: 2026-03-13
  • To address the frequent occurrence of runway excursion accidents in aviation safety, this study conducts a quantitative analysis of the factors influencing aircraft landing taxiing states and establishes a corresponding prediction model. A human-aircraft-environment coupled dynamics model for aircraft landing taxiing is developed in Simulink, focusing on the Airbus A320-214. This model incorporates a dynamic engine thrust module and integrates pilot operations, aircraft dynamics, crosswind, and wet runway surface conditions. Closed-loop simulations yield 3, 191 sets of data for analysis. The influence of various factors, such as water film thickness, pilot reaction speed, and touchdown ground speed, on runway excursions is quantified using multiple linear regression. The mechanism of thrust reverser imbalance affecting deviation distance is analyzed, leading to the establishment of predictive models for landing taxiing distance and deviation distance. The findings indicate that during landing taxiing, touchdown ground speed has a greater impact on taxiing distance than on deviation distance. Environmental factors like water film thickness, friction imbalance, and crosswind velocity are more likely to cause runway deviations. Among these, friction imbalance has the most pronounced effect on yaw direction, exceeding the impact of thrust reverser imbalance by a factor of 14.5, which ranks as the second most influential factor. Under specified conditions, a thrust reverser imbalance exceeding 0.4 pushes the deviation distance close to the safety threshold, representing a substantial risk. The multiple linear regression model for taxiing distance prediction demonstrates a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.88, a mean absolute error (MAE) of 48.32 m, and a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 7.75%. Prediction deviations for actual cases remain within 5%, indicating superior accuracy of the model for predicting aircraft landing taxiing distance.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王逸凡, 孙有朝, 刘勋, 等. 起飞阶段民机驾驶舱人机系统风险分析方法研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(4): 42-52. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.005

    WANG Y F, SUN Y Z, LIU X, et al. A risk analysis of human-machine system of civil aircraft in take-off stage[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 42-52. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.005
    [2]
    刘芳兵. 湿滑跑道飞机侧风着陆滑行安全研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2020.

    LIU F B. Research on crosswind landing taxiing safety of wet runway aircraft[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2020. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    齐心歌, 毕晟, 张楠, 等. 冲偏出跑道事件风险影响指标分析[J]. 航空工程进展, 2024, 15(1): 61-68.

    QI X G, BI S, ZHANG N, et al. Analysis of risk impact indicators for runway excursion events[J]. Progress in Aeronautical Engineering, 2024, 15(1): 61-68. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    赵赶超, 雷晶晶, 刘志强, 等. 基于Apriori算法的飞机冲偏出跑道诱因挖掘[J]. 计算机仿真, 2024, 41(2): 44-50.

    ZHAO G C, LEI J J, LIU Z Q, et al. Mining of inducements for aircraft deflecting off runway based on apriori algorithm[J]. Computer Simulation, 2024, 41(2): 44-50. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    占欣. 基于QAR数据的冲/偏出跑道风险评估研究[D]. 天津: 中国民航大学, 2019.

    ZHAN X. Risk assessment study on runway excursion based on qar data[D]. Tianjin: Civil Aviation University of China, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    温瑞英, 吴博, 褚双磊, 等. 民用飞机着陆距离预测研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 77-81.

    WEN R Y, WU B, CHU S L, et al. Research on prediction of landing distance of civil aircraft[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(1): 77-81. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    BARRY D J. Estimating runway veer-off risk using a Bayesian network with flight data[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 128: 103180. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103180
    [8]
    王洁宁, 张钰涵, 张聪俊. 基于STPA冲偏出跑道不安全控制行为分析[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2019, 37(6): 46-50.

    WANG J N, ZHANG Y H, ZHANG C J. Analysis of unsafe control behavior of runway excursion based on stpa[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2019, 37(6): 46-50. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    GALAGEDERA S D B, ADIKARIWATTAGE V, PASINDU H R. Evaluation of rapid exit locations based on veer-off risk for landing aircraft[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(9): 5134. doi: 10.3390/su13095134
    [10]
    汪磊, 安佳宁, 赵新斌, 等. 基于QAR数据的飞行员个体超限风险精细化评价模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34 (8): 35-42.

    WANG L, AN J N, ZHAO X B, et al. Refined evaluation model of individual pilot overrun risk based on qar data[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(8): 35-42. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    王文超, 何健, 宋佰胜, 等. 基于LSTM的航线飞行员操纵平稳性预测模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2024, 34(12): 48-55.

    WANG W C, HE J, SONG B S, et al. Prediction model of airline pilot maneuvering stationarity based on lstm[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2024, 34(12): 48-55. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    蔡靖, 牛玉发, 王岩, 等. 侧风湿滑条件飞机着陆滑跑姿态人机闭环动力学仿真分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025, 51(11): 3674-3687.

    CAI J, NIU Y F, WANG Y, et al. Simulation analysis of human-machine closed-loop dynamics of aircraft landing and taxiing attitude under crosswind and wet runway conditions[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51(11): 3674-3687. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    靳慧斌, 张静, 吕川. HRV在管制员疲劳检测中的适用性[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 44(11): 2292-2298.

    JIN H B, ZHANG J, LYU C. Applicability of hrv in controller fatigue detection[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 44(11): 2292-2298. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    DU X, GE D, DANG Z, et al. Rapid aerodynamic estimation of annular wings based on multiple linear regression[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2025, 158: 109887. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2024.109887
    [15]
    HOSSEINI S M, RADMEHR A, HOSSEINIAN AHANGARNEJAD A, et al. A statistical evaluation of multiple regression models for contact dynamics in rail vehicles using roller rig data[J]. International Journal of Rail Transportation, 2022, 10(6): 717-729. doi: 10.1080/23248378.2021.2021829
    [16]
    刘重阳, 齐东东, 冯大强, 等. 加力燃烧室试验燃气分析取样探针设计与验证[J]. 推进技术, 2023, 44(5): 138-148.

    LIU C Y, QI D D, FENG D Q, et al. Design and verification of gas analysis sampling probe for afterburner test[J]. Propulsion Technology, 2023, 44(5): 138-148. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    YU Y, LIU X, WANG E, et al. Dam safety evaluation based on multiple linear regression and numerical simulation[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51: 2451-2467. doi: 10.1007/s00603-018-1435-z
    [18]
    郭野晨风, 李杰, 胡明华, 等. 基于简化WITI指标的机场延误预测方法[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2017, 17(5): 207-213.

    GUO Y C F, LI J, HU M H, et al. Airport delay prediction method based on simplified witi index[J]. Transportation Systems Engineering and Information, 2017, 17(5): 207-213. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    张帅, 王宇, 钟伯文, 等. 面向客机总体设计的涡扇发动机分析模型[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2016, 48(3): 382-388.

    ZHANG S, WANG Y, ZHONG B W, et al. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2016, 48 (3): 382-388. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    黄敬杰, 张鑫, 孟超, 等. 反推力装置对民航飞机减速性能影响[J]. 航空动力学报, 2023, 38(3): 728-734.

    HUANG J J, ZHANG X, MENG C, et al. Effect of thrust reverser on deceleration performance of civil aircraft[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2023, 38(3): 728-734. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    李颜平, 吴刚. 基于典型数据集的数据预处理方法对比分析[J]. 沈阳工业大学学报, 2022, 44(02): 185-192.

    LI Y P, WU G. Comparative analysis of data preprocessing methods based on typical datasets[J]. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology, 2022, 44(2): 185-192. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    KVAM P H, VIDAKOVIC B. Nonparametric statistics with applications to science and engineering[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
    [23]
    董亚冰, 李瑞敏, 张萌佳, 等. 基于多元线性回归的匝道路段行车风险预测[J]. 公路, 2024, 69(9): 219-229.

    DONG Y B, LI R M, ZHANG M J, et al. Traffic risk prediction on ramp sections based on multiple linear regression[J]. Highway, 2024, 69(9): 219-229. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    韩勇, 卢明, 王丙雨, 等. 车—电动两轮车典型碰撞场景下汽车驾驶员反应差异[J]. 汽车安全与节能学报, 2023, 14(2): 182-190.

    HAN Y, LU M, WANG B Y, et al. Difference of car driver response in typical collision scenarios of vehicle-electric two-wheeled vehicle[J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy Conservation, 2023, 14(2): 182-190. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(14)  / Tables(14)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (12) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return