Volume 43 Issue 6
Dec.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XU Chuan, HU Jialin, GONG Liting, JIANG Xinguo. In-vehicle Navigation Technology Considering Traffic Safety: A Systematic Literature Review[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 1-10. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.001
Citation: XU Chuan, HU Jialin, GONG Liting, JIANG Xinguo. In-vehicle Navigation Technology Considering Traffic Safety: A Systematic Literature Review[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 1-10. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.001

In-vehicle Navigation Technology Considering Traffic Safety: A Systematic Literature Review

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.001
  • Received Date: 2025-04-10
    Available Online: 2026-03-13
  • With socioeconomic development, traffic safety receives increasing attention. This trend has driven traditional in-vehicle navigation technologies to shift from a single efficiency-oriented objective (minimizing travel time) toward a comprehensive optimization of traffic efficiency and safety. However, existing studies still suffer from limitations such as incomplete consideration of data dimensions, low adaptability to user needs, and difficulties in multi-objective trade-offs, which hinder their applicability in large-scale scenarios under future intelligent transportation systems. To address these gaps, this study adopts a systematic literature review approach and analyzes 51 core non-review publications. It focuses on four key research questions: data sources, traffic safety level measurement and prediction methods, safety-aware routing approaches, and technical validation strategies. The review synthesizes the current state of research and identifies core demands in the field, providing references and recommendations for the future development of navigation technologies in intelligent transportation environments. The findings indicate that, in terms of data sources, most existing studies rely on a single data source and fail to adequately capture real-time and microscopic traffic characteristics. Regarding safety level measurement and prediction, many approaches lack differentiation among various types of road units and do not sufficiently explore the evolutionary trends of traffic operational characteristics; moreover, due to challenges in data collection and the complexity of aggregation logic, achieving objective safety quantification remains difficult. For safety-aware routing methods, most studies simplify multi-objective problems into single-objective optimization, where the determination of objective weights lacks objective foundations and sufficient dynamic adaptability; although Pareto-front-based methods avoid explicit weight assignment, they face practical challenges such as reliance on preset parameters and relatively low computational efficiency. In terms of technical validation, real-world field tests provide the highest reliability but are constrained by high costs and limited scalability; simulations and data-driven scenario replay based on real data can effectively reduce testing costs, yet they often lack real-time interactive dynamics and may deviate from actual traffic conditions; subjective evaluation can supplement user perception and feedback, but trade-offs among sample size, participant characteristics, cost, and validity must be carefully balanced. Based on these insights, future research is recommended to focus on four major directions: ① establishing key navigation-related data framework under future traffic information environments. ②Integrating real-time traffic state inference into safety level prediction. ③Incorporating heterogeneous driving styles and personalized user needs to enhance routing techniques. ④Leveraging emerging technologies such as large language models to provide intelligent interaction and decision-support capabilities for next-generation navigation systems.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    SOHRABI S, WENG Y M, DAS S, et al. Safe route-finding: a review of literature and future directions[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 177: 106816.
    [2]
    HUANG H L, WEI Y L, HAN C Y, et al. Travel route safety estimation based on conflict simulation[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 171: 106666.
    [3]
    HOSEINZADEH N, ARVIN R, KHATTAK A J, et al. Integrating safety and mobility for pathfinding using big data generated by connected vehicles[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 24(4): 404-420. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2019.1699077
    [4]
    MOSTAFA S M, HABASHY S M, SALEM S A. A new framework for multi-objective route planning in smart cities[C]. 8th International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2022, Cairo, Egypt: Springer, 2023.
    [5]
    PAGE M J, MCKENZIE J E, BOSSUYT P M, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews[J]. International Journal of Surgery, 2021, 88: 105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
    [6]
    SOHRABI S, LORD D. Navigating to safety: Necessity, requirements, and barriers to considering safety in route finding[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2022, 137: 103542. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103542
    [7]
    HE Z, QIN X. Incorporating a safety index into pathfinding[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017, 2659(1): 63-70. doi: 10.3141/2659-07
    [8]
    PEŠIĆ D, ŠELMIĆ M, MACURA D, et al. Finding optimal route by two-criterion fuzzy Floyd's algorithm—case study Serbia[J]. Operational Research, 2020, 20(1): 119-138. doi: 10.1007/s12351-017-0319-4
    [9]
    KRUMM J, HORVITZ E. Risk-aware planning: methods and case study on safe driving routes[C]. 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, USA: AAAI, 2017.
    [10]
    KINGSBURY H, HARRIS D, DURDIN P. Journey optimisation by safest route[C]. 1st Australasian Road Safety Conference, Gold Coast, Australia: ARRB, 2015.
    [11]
    SARRAF R, MCGUIRE M P. A data driven approach for safe route planning[J]. International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research, 2018, 9(1): 1-18.
    [12]
    HAYES S, WANG S, DJAHEL S. Personalized road networks routing with road safety consideration: a case study in Manchester[C]. 2020 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), Piscataway, USA: IEEE, 2020.
    [13]
    TAKENO R, SEKI Y, SANO M, et al. A route navigation system for reducing risk of traffic accidents[C]. IEEE 5th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics, Kyoto, Japan: IEEE, 2016.
    [14]
    JIANG S, ZHANG Y L, LIU R, et al. Data-driven optimization for dynamic shortest path problem considering traffic safety[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(10): 18237-18252. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3165757
    [15]
    SOLÉ L, SAMMARCO M, DETYNIECKI M, et al. Towards drivers'safety with multi-criteria car navigation systems[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2022, 135: 1-9.
    [16]
    RAMOS J M A M, ALMEIDA V G J, SANTANA H, et al. User-centered analysis of a safe bus routing strategy[J]. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 2023, 14(1): 84-94. doi: 10.5753/jisa.2023.3075
    [17]
    KOZIEVITCH N P, MORALES C H G, AGNER L R N, et al. Safetrip: suggested itineraries to reduce accident risk factors[C]. 18th Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (SBSI), Curitiba, Brasil: Sociedade Brasileira de Computação(SBC), 2022.
    [18]
    LIU Q, KUMAR S, MAGO V. SafeRNet: safe transportation routing in the era of Internet of vehicles and mobile crowd sensing[C]. 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & NetworkingConference(CCNC), LasVegas, USA: IEEE, 2017.
    [19]
    CHANDRA S. Safety-based path finding in urban areas for older drivers and bicyclists[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2014, 48: 143-157. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.08.018
    [20]
    ABDELRAHMAN A, HASSANEIN H S, ABU-ALI N. iRouteSafe: personalized cloud-based route planning based on risk profiles of drivers[C]. 2019 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Waikoloa, USA: IEEE, 2019.
    [21]
    SAHNOON I, SHAWKY M, AL-GHAFLI A. Integrating traffic safety in vehicle routing solution[C]. The AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, Los Angeles, USA: Springer, 2017.
    [22]
    DIJKSTRA A. Assessing the safety of routes in a regional network[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2013, 32: 103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.10.008
    [23]
    LIAO X L, ZHOU T, WANG X, et al. Driver route planning method based on accident risk cost prediction[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022(1): 5023052.
    [24]
    DHOLAPURIYA A, MALLAH A, SINGH Y, et al. Optimal safe route recommendation by examining roadside accident attributes[J]. Journal of Information Technology, 2019, 7(1): 29-33.
    [25]
    章诗琪, 魏斐斐, 范馨月. 受天气与交通事故影响的安全路线选择模型[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2021, 57(10): 246-251.

    ZHANG S Q, WEI F F, FAN X Y. Model of secure routes selection influenced by weather and traffic accidents[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2021, 57(10): 246-251. (in Chinese)
    [26]
    BRITO M, SANTOS C, MARTINS B S, et al. Context-aware multi-modal route selection service for urban computing scenarios[J]. Ad Hoc Networks, 2024, 161: 103525. doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2024.103525
    [27]
    FU C, SAYED T. Bayesian dynamic extreme value modeling for conflict-based real-time safety analysis[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2022, 34: 100204. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2021.100204
    [28]
    GHOUL T, SAYED T, FU C. Real-time safest route identification: examining the trade-off between safest and fastest routes[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2023, 39: 100277. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2023.100277
    [29]
    TENG W, LAM W H K, TAM M L, et al. A reliability-based safest-path-finding algorithm in congested road networks with travel time uncertainties[C]. IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems(ITSC), Macau, China: IEEE, 2022.
    [30]
    FELÍCIO S, HORA J, FERREIRA M C, et al. Handling openstreetmap georeferenced data for route planning[J]. Transportation Research Procedia, 2022, 62: 189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2022.02.024
    [31]
    TORKEY A, ZAKI M H, DAMATTY A A E. A spatiotemporal GIS-approach for evaluating the safety of EV trips during wildfires[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2025, 127: 104268. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104268
    [32]
    EL-WAKEEL A S, NOURELDIN A, HASSANEIN H S, et al. iDriveSense: dynamic route planning involving roads quality information[C]. 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference(GLOBECOM), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: IEEE, 2018.
    [33]
    程泽阳, 孙凌霞, 丁恒, 等. 车路协同环境下道路交通安全研究进展[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2024, 22(3): 14-33.

    CHENG Z Y, SUN L X, DING H, et al. Research progress of road traffic safety in cooperative vehicle infrastructure environment[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2024, 22(3): 14-33. (in Chinese)
    [34]
    GARG S, MITTAL A, SATHIYASUNTHARAM V. Deep learning based model to recommend safe route navigation system[C]. 2nd International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Technology and Networking (CICTN), Ghaziabad, India: IEEE, 2025.
    [35]
    KATICHA S W, FLINTSCH G W. A kernel density empirical Bayes(KDEB)approach to estimate accident risk[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2023, 186: 107039.
    [36]
    辛怡, 李刚, 邓有为, 等. 融合PCA-LPP与DBSCAN的道路交通事故分类及风险等级预测方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(4): 44-54.

    XIN Y, LI G, DENG Y W, et al. Classifying road accidents and forecasting level of risk based on a combined PCA-LPP and DBSCAN method[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(4): 44-54. (in Chinese)
    [37]
    赵国强, 谢李鑫. 一种考虑行程安全性的城市绿色路径规划算法[J]. 测绘技术装备, 2025, 27(1): 33-38.

    ZHAO G Q, XIE L X. An urban green path finding algorithm by considering travelling safety[J]. Geomatics Technology and Equipment, 2025, 27(1): 33-38. (in Chinese)
    [38]
    ALSHEREF F K. Route recommendation model Via an analytic hierarchy process (AHP)[J]. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 2019, 11(9): 17-24. doi: 10.5373/JARDCS/V11I9/20192768
    [39]
    庞劭荣, 张诗波, 罗龙浩, 等. 基于改进云组合赋权的智能网联驾驶场景安全性评价方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(5): 35-42. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.05.004

    PANG S R, ZHANG S B, LUO L H, et al. A method for evaluating safety of driving scenes with intelligent connected vehicles based on an improved cloud combination weighting[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41 (5): 35-42. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.05.004
    [40]
    朱兴林, 陈梦瑶, 刘泓君, 等. 基于多源信息融合的城市快速路驾驶风险辨识与方法[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2025, 23(2): 110-121.

    ZHU X L, CHEN M Y, LIU H J, et al. Risk identification and method of urban-expressway driving based on multisource information fusion[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information, 2025, 23(2): 110-121. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (15) PDF downloads(3) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return