Volume 43 Issue 5
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HAN Yaxiong, CHU Liangyong, FENG Guanghong, LIU Quan. A DEMATEL-ISM-BN Model for Causation Analysis of Safety Incidents in Civil Aviation Airport Flight Area[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(5): 57-69. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.05.006
Citation: HAN Yaxiong, CHU Liangyong, FENG Guanghong, LIU Quan. A DEMATEL-ISM-BN Model for Causation Analysis of Safety Incidents in Civil Aviation Airport Flight Area[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(5): 57-69. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.05.006

A DEMATEL-ISM-BN Model for Causation Analysis of Safety Incidents in Civil Aviation Airport Flight Area

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.05.006
  • Received Date: 2024-11-05
    Available Online: 2026-03-05
  • This study proposes a coupled causal analysis model integrating decision making trial and evaluation laboratory, interpretative structural modeling, and Bayesian network to address challenges in clarifying risk evolution paths and enabling dynamic prediction for airport flight area safety. A causal factor system for safety incidents is first constructed, covering human, equipment, environment, and management dimensions, based on aircraft incident reports, literature, and expert knowledge. The improved decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory method integrates objective accident causation chains with expert judgments to enhance relationship identification accuracy. The interpretative structural modeling then establishes a multi-level hierarchical structure, explicitly preserving critical cross-level relationships to better characterize system complexity. This optimized topology is mapped into a Bayesian network. Through improved methods for determining prior and conditional probabilities, the Bayesian parameter estimation enables the forward prediction of incident probabilities and the backward diagnosis of critical causation chains. A case study of an airport in North China demonstrates the model's effectiveness. The prior probability of a flight area safety incident is 4.26%. Under different evidence inputs, the probability dynamically ranges between 4.38% and 14.00%. Backward diagnosis identifies the key causation chain as: "imperfect departmental coordination mechanism → communication and coordination failure → inadequate emergency response → flight area safety incident". Comparisons with existing studies, such as questionnaire-based structural equation modeling, show the proposed model provides clearer path logic and advances from static correlation analysis to dynamic probabilistic inference. The case analysis results align closely with actual accident findings, validating the model's practical utility and reliability in proactive safety management for airport flight areas.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZHANG T, ZHANG Z, ZHU X, et al. Aircraft engine danger areas incursion detection using keypoint detection and IoT[J]. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2024, 93: 7-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.003
    [2]
    SUN J, TANG X, SHAO Q. A collision risk assessment method for aircraft on the apron based on Petri nets[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(19): 9128. doi: 10.3390/app14199128
    [3]
    王兴隆, 周督异. 基于复杂网络的飞行区冲突关键栅格区识别[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(8): 32-38.

    WANG X L, ZHOU D Y. Identification of critical grid areas in flight area conflicts based on complex network[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2023, 19(8): 32-38. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    周督异, 王兴隆. 动态安全间隔下机场飞行区冲突热点识别[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2024, 20(9): 197-204.

    ZHOU D Y, WANG X L. Identification of conflict hotspots in airport flight area under dynamic safety separation[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2024, 20(9): 197-204. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    吴维, 吴泽萱, 王兴隆. 机场飞行区多层异质链序风险传播模型研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2024, 50(7): 2225-2236.

    WU W, WU Z X, WANG X L. Research on multi-layer heterogeneous chain sequence risk propagation model in airport movement area[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2024, 50(7): 2225-2236. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    汤新民, 李孟沅, 刘雨生. 基于构型空间的机场飞行区安全预警研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2024, 46(11): 101-109.

    TANG X M, LI M Y, LIU Y S. Research on airport movement area safety warning based on configuration space[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2024, 46(11): 101-109. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    ZHU R, YANG Z, CHEN J. Conflict risk assessment between non-cooperative drones and manned aircraft in airport terminal areas[J]. Applied Sciences, 2022, 12(20): 10377. doi: 10.3390/app122010377
    [8]
    SILAGYI Ⅱ D V, LIU D. Prediction of severity of aviation landing accidents using support vector machine models[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2023, 187: 107043.
    [9]
    王菲茵, 袁锦彤, 汪磊. 典型机型冲偏出跑道耦合故障模式及风险建模[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(6): 42-50. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.06.005

    WANG F Y, YUAN J T, WANG L. Coupling failure mode and risk modeling of typical aircrafts runway excursion[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(6): 42-50. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.06.005
    [10]
    丰婷, 罗帆, 赵贤利. 基于结构方程模型的机场飞行区安全风险因素分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 28(3): 371-376.

    FENG T, LUO F, ZHAO X L. Airfield security risk factors based on structural equation model[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2015, 28 (3): 371-376. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    潘丹, 李永周, 罗帆, 等. 民用机场飞行区安全风险识别及作用机制[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2019, 29(4): 152-157.

    PAN D, LI Y Z, LUO F, et al. Risk identification and action mechanism of flying area in civil airport[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(4): 152-157. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    张欣, 葛昊, 段续庭, 等. 民用机场飞行区风险因素及耦合关系分析[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2024, 15(5): 44-52.

    ZHANG X, GE H, DUAN X T, et al. Analysis on risk factor and coupling relationship in flight area of civil airport[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2024, 15 (5): 44-52. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    肖琴, 罗帆. 基于突变理论和模糊集的机场飞行区安全风险评价[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2018, 18(5): 1730-1736.

    XIAO Q, LUO F. On the safety risk assessment of the airport flight area based on the catastrophe theory and fuzzy set[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2018, 18 (5): 1730-1736. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    邵荃, 尉炜. 异常天气下飞行区运行风险评估[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(13): 319-324.

    SHAO Q, WEI W. Operation risk assessment of flight areas under abnormal weather[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2019, 19(13): 319-324. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    傅宁, 邵月龄. 基于物元可拓模型的机场飞行区安全风险评价及影响程度分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(12): 4247-4254.

    FU N, SHAO Y L. Safety risk assessment and influence degree analysis of the flight area based on the matter-element extension theory[J]. Journal of Safety and Environmen, 2023, 23(12): 4247-4254. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    王兴隆, 邱鑫, 赵俊妮. 机场飞行区运行安全韧性评估与提升[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(4): 18-27.

    WANG X L, QIU X, ZHAO J N. Airport flight zone operational safety resilience assessment and enhancement[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(4): 18-27. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    刘龙展, 王勇, 潘冬. 基于DEMATEL-ISM熵权法的机场异常事件风险评价研究[J]. 民航学报, 2025, 9(5): 35-40+79.

    LIU L Z, WANG Y, PAN D. Risk assessment of airport abnormal events based on DEMATEL-ISM entropy weight method[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation, 2025, 9(5): 35-40+79. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    潘丹, 李永周, 罗帆, 等. 飞行区外来物入侵安全风险致因FTA-BN模型[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(6): 7-13.

    PAN D, LI Y Z, LUO F, et al. FTA-BN model of risks causation for FOD intrusion in flight area[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(6): 7-13. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    宋洋, 王瑞琪, 张鹏. 基于DEMATEL-ISM模型的航站楼安全韧性影响因素分析[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2025, 43 (2): 52-57+82.

    SONG Y, WANG R Q, ZHANG P. Analysis of factors affecting terminal safety resilience based on DEMATEL-ISM model[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2025, 43 (2): 52-57+82. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    徐一旻, 田梦莹, 李治, 等. FTA-BN在机场跑道入侵事故影响因素分析中的应用[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(5): 1361-1367.

    XU Y M, TIAN M Y, LI Z, et al. Analysis of influencing factors of airport runway incursion accident based on FTA-BN[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23 (5): 1361-1367. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    孟光磊, 丛泽林, 宋彬, 等. 贝叶斯网络结构学习综述[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025, 51(9): 2829-2849.

    MENG G L, CONG Z L, SONG B, et al. A review of bayesian network structure learning[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51 (9): 2829-2849. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    陈芳, 向千秋, 陈茜. 基于模糊DEMATEL-BN的管制单位动态风险评估[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(1): 35-43.

    CHEN F, XIANG Q Q, CHEN Q. Dynamic risk evaluation of ATC based on fuzzy DEMATEL-BN[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23(1): 35-43. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    岳仁田, 韩亚雄. 航空公司安全风险因素分析的DEMATEL-ISM模型研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2020, 20(6): 2091-2097.

    YUE R T, HAN Y X. On the DEMATEL-ISM model for analyzing the safety risk-involving factors of the airline companies[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2020, 20(6): 2091-2097. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    LI F, WANG W H, STEVAN D, et al. Analysis on accident-causing factors of urban buried gas pipeline network by combining DEMATEL, ISM and BN methods[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 61: 49-57.
    [25]
    傅贵, 索晓, 贾清淞, 等. 10种事故致因模型的对比研究[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2018, 14(2): 58-63.

    FU G, SUO X, JIA Q S, et al. Comparative study on ten accident causation models[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2018, 14(2): 58-63. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (35) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return