Volume 43 Issue 5
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Gongquan, REN Dian, HUANG Helai, CHANG Fangrong. A Cooperative Control Method for Signal and Vehicles at Intersections Considering Pedestrian Crossing Safety[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(5): 24-32. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.05.003
Citation: ZHANG Gongquan, REN Dian, HUANG Helai, CHANG Fangrong. A Cooperative Control Method for Signal and Vehicles at Intersections Considering Pedestrian Crossing Safety[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(5): 24-32. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.05.003

A Cooperative Control Method for Signal and Vehicles at Intersections Considering Pedestrian Crossing Safety

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.05.003
  • Received Date: 2025-02-10
    Available Online: 2026-03-05
  • Addressing frequent jaywalking, pedestrian-vehicle conflict risk, and heavy congestion at signalized intersections under mixed traffic, this study develops a cooperative control framework for traffic signals, connected autonomous vehicle (CAV), and pedestrians. In Stage 1, a protect/prohibit right-turning (PPRT) strategy is integrated into a pedestrian-oriented deep reinforcement learning (DRL) controller. The state encodes spatial-temporal conditions using matrices of vehicle and pedestrian positions and speeds. Actions split phases into pedestrian-through and vehicle left/right turns to achieve temporal-spatial separation of key conflicts. The reward is based on the difference in cumulative waiting time with passenger-load weighting to reflect social efficiency, and the optimal policy is learned with a dueling double deep Q-network. In Stage 2, coordinated speed planning for pedestrians and CAV is designed to further reduce interactions and delay. Pedestrian speeds are bounded by feasible ranges derived from crossing distance and remaining green time with acceleration and speed constraints and with compliance and stochastic perturbations considered. CAV adjust to safety-feasible speeds when high-risk situations are detected and receive speed guidance for left-turn and through movements to pass the intersection smoothly. Using a Changsha intersection and local traffic data, an intelligent connected intersection and mixed-traffic scenario and implement simulations are built in SUMO. Results show that the proposed method yields 897 pedestrian-vehicle conflicts and 272 jaywalking events at 50% CAV penetration, reductions of 43.37% and 53.7% compared with PPRT. Average per-capita delay is 11.61 s, which is 39.15%, 55.03%, and 13.62% lower than actuated control, PPRT, and DRL-based signal control, and the number of stops decreases to 3 279. Performance improves with higher CAV penetration, with conflicts reduced by 16.60% from 0% to 25%, and overall metrics reaching the best level at 100%.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    RAONIAR R, SINGH S, PATHAK A, et al. Analysis of pedestrian-vehicle interaction dynamics at signalized urban intersections: a surrogate safety measure approach[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2025, 2679(4): 1042-1063.
    [2]
    FENG M, ZHAO J, HOU C, et al. Investigating the safety influence path of right-turn configurations on vehicle-pedestrian conflict risk at signalized intersections[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2025, 211: 107910.
    [3]
    CHEN L, ENGLUND C. Cooperative intersection management: a survey[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2016, 17(2): 570-586. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2471812
    [4]
    HALEEM K, ALLURI P, GAN A. Analyzing pedestrian crash injury severity at signalized and non-signalized locations[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2015, 81: 14-23.
    [5]
    王长帅, 邵永成, 朱彤, 等. 城市道路中间路段人车冲突中网联预警信息对驾驶行为的影响[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42 (4): 81-89. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.009

    WANG C S, SHAO Y C, ZHU T. Impacts of connected warning information on driver behavior in pedestrian-vehicle conflict at the mid-block of urban roads[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 81-89. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.009
    [6]
    FURTH P, KOONCE P, MIAO Y, et al. Mitigating right-turn conflict with protected yet concurrent phasing for cycle track and pedestrian crossings[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2014, 2438(1): 81-88. doi: 10.3141/2438-09
    [7]
    HOWLADER M M, YASMIN S, BHASKAR A, et al. A before-after evaluation of protected right-turn signal phasings by applying empirical bayes and full bayes approaches with heterogenous count data models[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2023, 179: 106882.
    [8]
    HOWLADER M M, ALI Y, BURBRIDGE A, et al. Before-after safety evaluation of part-time protected right-turn signals: an extreme value theory approach by applying artificial intelligence-based video analytics[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 194: 107341.
    [9]
    ABADI M G, HURWITZ D. Operational Impacts of protected-permitted right-turn phasing and pavement markings on bicyclist performance during conflicts with right-turning vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Record, 2019, 2673(4): 789-799.
    [10]
    ZAFRI N M, RONY A I, ADRI N. Study on pedestrian compliance behavior at vehicular traffic signals and traffic-police-controlled intersections[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 2020, 18(3): 400-411.
    [11]
    WANG A Y, ZHANG K, LI M, et al. Game theory-based signal control considering both pedestrians and vehicles in connected environment[J]. Sensors, 2023, 23(23): 9438.
    [12]
    XU K J, HUANG J Q, KONG L H, et al. PV-TSC: learning to control traffic signals for pedestrian and vehicle traffic in 6g era[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023, 24(7): 7552-7563.
    [13]
    YAZDANI M, SARVI M, BAGLOEE S A, et al. Intelligent vehicle pedestrian light(IVPL): a deep reinforcement learning approach for traffic signal control[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2023, 149: 103991.
    [14]
    AREL I, LIU C, URBANIK T, et al. Reinforcement learning-based multi-agent system for network traffic signal control[J]. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 2010, 4(2): 128-135.
    [15]
    DUCROCQ R, FARHI N. Deep reinforcement q-learning for intelligent traffic signal control with partial detection[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research, 2023, 23(1): 192-206.
    [16]
    ULLAH Z, AI-TURJMAN F, MOSTARD L, et al. Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in smart cities[J]. Computer Communications, 2020, 154: 313-323.
    [17]
    姚志洪, 金玉婷, 王思琛, 等. 混入智能网联汽车的交通流稳定性与安全性分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 136-143.

    YAO Z H, JIN Y T, WANG S C, et al. Analysis of traffic flow stability and safety with the introduction of intelligent connected vehicles[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 136-143.
    [18]
    张名芳, 马艳华, 马勇. 无信号交叉口人车冲突严重程度影响因素分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2023, 33(8): 190-197.

    ZHANG M F, MA Y H, MA Y. Analysis of factors influencing the severity of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts at unsignalized intersections[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2023, 33 (8): 190-197.
    [19]
    张功权, 常方蓉, 金杰灵, 等. 安全驱动的城市交叉口自适应信号控制方法[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2023, 19(10): 192-199.

    ZHANG G Q, CHANG F L, JIN J L, et al. Safety-driven adaptive signal control method for urban intersections[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2023, 19(10): 192-199.
    [20]
    SHI Y Y, LIU Z K, WANG Z H, et al. An integrated traffic and vehicle co-simulation testing framework for connected and autonomous vehicles[J]. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2022, 14(6): 26-40.
    [21]
    ZHOU Z P, ZHOU Y, PU Z Y, et al. Simulation of pedestrian behavior during the flashing green signal using a modified social force model[J]. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 2019, 15(2): 1019-1040.
    [22]
    ZHANG G Q, CHANG F L, JIN J L, et al. Multi-objective deep reinforcement learning approach for adaptive traffic signal control system with concurrent optimization of safety, efficiency, and decarbonization at intersections[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 199: 107451.
    [23]
    汤天培, 袁泉, 袁美宁, 等. 人非混行状态下行人心理边界的影响因素分析[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(4): 136-143. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.015

    TANG T P, YUAN Q, YUAN M N, et al. Determinants of pedestrians' psychological boundary in the coexistence of pedestrian and non-motorized vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 136-143. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.015
    [24]
    NIROUMAND R, LEILA H, ALI H. Advancing the white phase mobile traffic control paradigm to consider pedestrians[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2024, 39(13): 1946-1962. frastructureEngineering, 2024, 39 (13): 1946-1962.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (44) PDF downloads(10) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return