Volume 43 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Hongtai, YANG Zijian, LIU Xiang, ZHENG Rong, LIU Zheng, GE Qian, JI Ang. A Design & Optimization Method for Intercity Demand-responsive Transit Considering Passengers' Choice Behavior[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 168-180. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.017
Citation: YANG Hongtai, YANG Zijian, LIU Xiang, ZHENG Rong, LIU Zheng, GE Qian, JI Ang. A Design & Optimization Method for Intercity Demand-responsive Transit Considering Passengers' Choice Behavior[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 168-180. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.017

A Design & Optimization Method for Intercity Demand-responsive Transit Considering Passengers' Choice Behavior

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.017
  • Received Date: 2024-03-24
  • Demand-responsive transit is an emerging reservation-based travel service. However, existing studies have mainly focused on intracity context, while studies on service design and optimization in intercity context re-main limited. Meanwhile, current models typically pursue a single operator-oriented objective, such as operational cost minimization or profit maximization, but rarely incorporate operation profits and consumer surplus, thereby lim-iting their ability to enhance overall social welfare. Additionally, most studies assume fixed demand density and fail to adequately involve passengers'choice preferences. To address these shortcomings, this study incorporates passen-gers'choice behavior and develops a design & optimization model for intercity demand-responsive transit (IDRT) service. The objective of this model is maximizing social welfare, which is defined as the sum of operation profits and consumer surplus. The decision variables include departure interval, service-area ratio between the major city and satellite cities, and ticket fare. The model is formulated using the continuous approximation method and solved with the Lagrange multiplier method. Furthermore, the optimal solutions of models with social welfare maximiza-tion and operation profit maximization are compared. Results show that although operation profit is negative in the model of social welfare maximization, an appropriate subsidy can raise social welfare from 54.976 CNY/h to 110.906 CNY/h, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method. The results of the sensitivity analysis on se-lected model parameters indicate that the service area of satellite cities has only a minor impact on social welfare and is not a key constraint in IDRT layout, whereas length of intercity highway has a significant influence on passen-gers'choice behavior, highlighting the importance of empirical surveys for rational deployment of IDRT layout. Over-all, the proposed method not only provides decision-makers with a practical tool to determine departure intervals, ser-vice-area allocation, and ticket fares given demand density conditions, but also assists them in selecting appropriate vehicle types based on sensitivity analysis, thereby improving both operational efficiency and social welfare.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    方瑞韬, 邵海鹏, 林涛. 常态化疫情防控阶段旅客中长距离城际出行联合选择行为建模[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41 (1): 151-160. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.016

    FANG R T, SHAO H P, LIN T. A joint mode choice behavior model of long-distance intercity passenger travel during the periods with regular epidemic prevention and control mea-sures[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safe-ty, 2023, 41(1): 151-160. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.01.016
    [2]
    云亮, 蒋阳升, 宋雪梅. 机动式辅助客运系统(MAST)及其研究进展综述[J]. 交通运输工程与信息学报, 2009, 7(4): 79-83, 123.

    YUN L, JIANG Y S, SONG X M. Introduction of mobility al-lowance shuttle transit system(MAST)and the summary of its research progress[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineer-ing and Information, 2009, 7(4): 79-83, 123. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    DIANA M, QUADRIFOGLIO L, PRONELLO C. A method-ology for comparing distances traveled by performance-equiv-alent fixed-route and demand responsive transit services[J]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2009, 32(4): 377-399. doi: 10.1080/03081060903119618
    [4]
    YU J, LU X, PAN S, et al. Traveler willingness to use flexible transit services in China: case study of Qilu Software Park[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Develop-ment, 2017, 143(2): 05016018. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000373
    [5]
    KOFFMAN D. Operational experiences with flexible transit services[M]. Transportation Research Board, 2004.
    [6]
    RANJBARI A, CHIU Y-C, HICKMAN M. Exploring factors affecting demand for possible future intercity transit op-tions[J]. Public Transport, 2017, (9): 463-481.
    [7]
    CURRIE G, FOURNIER N. Why most DRT/micro-transits fail-what the survivors tell us about progress[J]. Research in Transportation Economics, 2020, 83: 100895. doi: 10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100895
    [8]
    YANG H. Rural to urban intercity transit user characteristics analysis, demand estimation and network design[D]. Knox-ville: University of Tennessee, 2013.
    [9]
    ZHENG R, YANG H, FAN W, et al. Optimizing service de-sign for the intercity demand responsive transit system: mod-el, algorithm, and comparative analysis[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2024, 254: 124180. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124180
    [10]
    YANG H, ZHANG Z, FAN W, et al. Optimal design for de-mand responsive connector service considering elastic de-mand[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2021, 22(4): 2476-2486. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3054678
    [11]
    KIM M E, LEVY J, SCHONFELD P. Optimal zone sizes and headways for flexible-route bus services[J]. Transporta-tion Research Part B: Methodological, 2019, 130: 67-81. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2019.10.006
    [12]
    KHATTAK A J, YIM Y. Traveler response to innovative per-sonalized demand-responsive transit in the San Francisco Bay Area[J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Develop-ment, 2004, 130(1): 42-55. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:1(42)
    [13]
    YANG H, CHERRY C R. Use characteristics and demo-graphics of rural transit riders: a case study in Tennessee[J]. Transportation Planning and Technology, 2017, 40(2): 213-227. doi: 10.1080/03081060.2016.1266168
    [14]
    QUADRIFOGLIO L, LI X. A methodology to derive the crit-ical demand density for designing and operating feeder tran-sit services[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodolog-ical, 2009, 43(10): 922-935. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2009.04.003
    [15]
    KIM M E, SCHONFELD P. Maximizing net benefits for con-ventional and flexible bus services[J]. Transportation Re-search Part A: Policy and Practice, 2015, 80: 116-133. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.07.016
    [16]
    CHANG S K, SCHONFELD P M. Optimization models for comparing conventional and subscription bus feeder servic-es[J]. Transportation Science, 1991, 25(4): 281-298. doi: 10.1287/trsc.25.4.281
    [17]
    张梦珠. 基于公共交通数据的定制公交客流转移预测研究[D]. 威海: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2022.

    ZHANG M Z. Research on prediction of customized bus pas-senger flow transfer based on public transportation data[D]. Weihai: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    李欢. 基于连续近似法的公交线路优化及实例分析[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2018.

    LI H. Optimization and case study of transit lines based on continuum approximation[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiao-tong University, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    卢小林, 潘述亮, 邹难. 复杂路网下灵活接驳公交路径优化研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(6): 128-134.

    LU X L, PAN S L, ZOU N. Flexible feeder transit route de-sign in complex road network[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(6): 128-134. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    邱丰, 李文权, 沈金星. 可变线路式公交的两阶段车辆调度模型[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1078-1084.

    QIU F, LI W Q, SHEN J X. Two-stage model for flex-route transit scheduling[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natu-ral Science Edition), 2014, 44(5): 1078-1084. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    ZHENG R, YANG H, JIANG L, et al. Optimizing the clean-ing and disinfection scheme for dockless shared bikes[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2023, 2023 (1): 5702188.
    [22]
    DAGANZO C F. The length of tours in zones of different shapes[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodologi-cal, 1984, 18(2): 135-145. doi: 10.1016/0191-2615(84)90027-4
    [23]
    CHIEN S I J, SPASOVIC L N. Optimization of grid bus tran-sit systems with elastic demand[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2002, 36(1): 63-91. doi: 10.1002/atr.5670360105
    [24]
    KOCUR G, HENDRICKSON C. Design of local bus service with demand equilibration[J]. Transportation Sci-ence, 1982, 16(2): 149-170. doi: 10.1287/trsc.16.2.149
    [25]
    DAGANZO C F. An approximate analytic model of many-to-many demand responsive transportation systems[J]. Trans-portation Research, 1978, 12(5): 325-333. doi: 10.1016/0041-1647(78)90007-2
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return