Volume 44 Issue 4
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Ya rigui, ZHANG Yu, LU Xuan, TANG Kexin. Collaborative Optimization of Continuous Berth Allocation and Shore Power Scheduling via a Q-Learning-Based Selection Hyper-Heuristic[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(4): 102-115. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2026.04.010
Citation: Ya rigui, ZHANG Yu, LU Xuan, TANG Kexin. Collaborative Optimization of Continuous Berth Allocation and Shore Power Scheduling via a Q-Learning-Based Selection Hyper-Heuristic[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(4): 102-115. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2026.04.010

Collaborative Optimization of Continuous Berth Allocation and Shore Power Scheduling via a Q-Learning-Based Selection Hyper-Heuristic

doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2026.04.010
  • Received Date: 2026-02-20
    Available Online: 2026-11-06
  • This study addresses the joint scheduling of continuous berth allocation and shore power connection under uncertainty in ships' power demand. A mixed-integer programming model is formulated to minimize the total cost. The model considers non-overlapping spatiotemporal berth occupation, shore power coverage, ship-shore interface compatibility, and shore power capacity constraints. An uncertainty budget is introduced to reformulate the capacity constraint into a linear robust counterpart. A Q-learning-based selection hyper-heuristic algorithm (QLSHH) is proposed. A hybrid encoding scheme represents berthing positions and shore power decisions. Q-learning dynamically selects low-level heuristic operators, and eight complementary operators are integrated with a structured decoding mechanism. For small-scale instances, the average deviation of QLSHH from the exact solutions of Gurobi ranges from 0.1% to 5.0%. For medium and large-scale instances, QLSHH reduces the total cost by 4.12%-11.65% compared with a genetic algorithm (GA). It outperforms an adaptive large neighborhood search algorithm (ALNS) by 3.75%-25.33%. The average shore power utilization rate remains between 90% and 95.41%. As the uncertainty budget increases, the shore power utilization rate decreases and the total cost increases. A higher shore power capacity limit improves the utilization rate and reduces the total cost. However, the marginal benefit diminishes when the capacity exceeds approximately 4 500 kW. Therefore, the capacity should be configured according to practical electricity demand under a given uncertainty budget.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    范爱龙, 严新平, 李忠奎, 等. 我国航运业绿色低碳发展的需求、路径与展望[J]. 船海工程, 2024, 53(4): 1-5, 12.

    FAN A L, YAN X P, LI Z K, et al. Demand, path and prospect of green and low-carbon development of China's shipping industry[J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2024, 53(4): 1-5, 12. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    王枭, 赵山峰, 张乾能, 等. 面向港口关键起重设备调峰的协调优化运行方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2025, 43(6): 148-158. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.014

    WANG X, ZHAO S F, ZHANG Q N, et al. A coordinated optimization method for peak-shaving operation of key port crane equipment[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(6): 148-158. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.06.014
    [3]
    彭云, 李相达, 王文渊, 等. 绿色集装箱港口节能减排策略综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2022, 22(4): 28-46.

    PENG Y, LI X D, WANG W Y, et al. Research overview on energy conservation and emission reduction strategies for green container ports[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2022, 22(4): 28-46. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    ZIS T. Prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 119: 82-95. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.003
    [5]
    郑童, 李俊, 赵梦孺, 等. 考虑岸电分配的集装箱码头泊位调度优化研究[J]. 中国航海, 2025, 48(3): 73-81.

    ZHENG T, LI J, ZHAO M R, et al. Research on berth scheduling optimization of container terminals considering shore power allocation[J]. Navigation of China, 2025, 48(3): 73-81. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    ZHANG Z, ZHU Y, ZHU J, et al. Collaborative optimization of shore power and berth allocation based on economic, environmental, and operational efficiency[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2025, 13(4): 776. doi: 10.3390/jmse13040776
    [7]
    闵德权, 张志铎, 张伟航. 基于港口环境效益的岸电与泊位联合分配优化研究[J]. 重庆交通大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 42(1): 83-90.

    MIN D Q, ZHANG Z D, ZHANG W H. Research on joint allocation optimization of shore power and berths based on port environmental benefits[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 42(1): 83-90. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    WANG Z, HU H, ZHEN L. Berth and quay cranes allocation problem with on-shore power supply assignment in container terminals[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2024, 188: 109910.
    [9]
    PENG Y, DONG M, LI X, et al. Cooperative optimization of shore power allocation and berth allocation: a balance between cost and environmental benefit[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123816. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123816
    [10]
    MA K, FENG Y, YANG J, et al. Two-stage distributionally robust optimization for port integrated energy system with berth allocation under uncertainties[J]. Energy, 2025, 322: 135588. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.135588
    [11]
    ZHANG Y, LIANG C, SHI J, et al. Optimal port microgrid scheduling incorporating onshore power supply and berth allocation under uncertainty[J]. Applied Energy, 2022, 313: 118856.
    [12]
    LIU W, ZHU X, WANG L, et al. Rolling horizon based robust optimization method of quayside operations in maritime container ports[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 256: 111505. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111505
    [13]
    LYU Y, ZOU M, LI J, et al. Dynamic berth allocation under uncertainties based on deep reinforcement learning towards resilient ports[J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2024, 252: 107113. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107113
    [14]
    JO S, MOON I. A hierarchical reinforcement learning approach for real-time berth allocation and quay crane scheduling[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2025, 63(24): 10027-10052. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2025.2542518
    [15]
    BERTSIMAS D, SIM M. Robust discrete optimization and network flows[J]. Mathematical Programming, 2003, 98(1): 49-71.
    [16]
    ZHANG Z Q, QIAN B, HU R, et al. Q-learning-based hyper-heuristic evolutionary algorithm for the distributed assembly blocking flowshop scheduling problem[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2023, 146: 110695. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110695
    [17]
    李凯文. 基于深度强化学习的组合优化方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科技大学, 2022.

    LI K W. Research on combinatorial optimization methods based on deep reinforcement learning[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    ZHENG Q, XUAN H, ZHANG Y, et al. Q-learning-based multi-objective heuristic algorithm for solving multi-resource co-scheduling problem of ship-lock-channel considering water discharge[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 26(12): 21588-21604. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2025.3607755
    [19]
    文捷, 刘昊雨, 王永才, 等. 潮汐影响下基于长方体排列的船舶调度问题研究[J]. 中国航海, 2024, 47(3): 81-88.
    [20]
    HELLSTEN O E, SACRAMENTO D, PISINGER D. An adaptive large neighbourhood search heuristic for routing and scheduling feeder vessels in multi-terminal ports[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 287(2): 682-698. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.050
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (27) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return