Volume 44 Issue 4
Aug.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
QI Xinge, YANG Ruitong, LEI Bowen, LIU Chang. Risk Factor Analysis and Path Identification Method for Runway Excursion During Landing Based on Bayesian Network[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(4): 58-67. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2026.04.006
Citation: QI Xinge, YANG Ruitong, LEI Bowen, LIU Chang. Risk Factor Analysis and Path Identification Method for Runway Excursion During Landing Based on Bayesian Network[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2026, 44(4): 58-67. doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2026.04.006

Risk Factor Analysis and Path Identification Method for Runway Excursion During Landing Based on Bayesian Network

doi: 10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2026.04.006
  • Received Date: 2026-01-04
    Available Online: 2026-11-06
  • To address the complex relationships among risk factors of runway overrun and veer-off during landing, the difficulty of directly reflecting flight-physical relationships through statistical associations, and the lack of quantitative diagnosis of key risk paths, a runway excursion risk analysis and path identification method integrating association rule mining and Bayesian networks (BN) was investigated. Based on 224 valid landing records obtained from the quick access recorders (QAR) of a B737-800 fleet from an airline, 15 key parameters in three categories, including aircraft states, pilot operations, and environmental wind conditions, were selected. The Apriori algorithm was used to mine strong associations among the parameters and generate candidate links for the BN. The directions of these links were then verified according to the energy-dissipation mechanism of runway overrun and the lateral-dynamics mechanism of runway veer-off, and statistical associations lacking a physical basis were removed, thereby establishing a network structure jointly constrained by data associations and flight-physical mechanisms. The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm was employed for network parameter learning, and mutual information (MI) was used to identify key risk factors. Bayesian backward inference combined with the ratio of variation (ROV) was further applied to quantitatively diagnose upstream association paths under high-risk target states. The results show that when ground speed was in a high-risk state, the ROV values of the paths associated with pitch angle and brake pressure were 0.348 and 0.306, respectively; when vertical load was in a high-risk state, the ROV value of the path associated with descent rate was 3.911; for runway veer-off, when bank angle was in a high-risk state, the ROV value of the path associated with rudder position was 0.222. The quantitative results distinguish key upstream association paths under different high-risk target states, extending runway excursion risk analysis from key risk factor identification to quantitative diagnosis of key risk paths.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Boeing Commercial Airplanes. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents: worldwide operations 1959—2025[R]. Seattle, WA: The Boeing Company, 2026.
    [2]
    张宇辉, 胡思睿, 常鑫. 飞机雷雨情景着陆冲偏出跑道的贝叶斯网络风险分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(10): 3709-3718.

    ZHANG Y H, HU S R, CHANG X. Bayesian network risk analysis of aircraft runway excursion during thunderstorm scenarios[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2024, 24(10): 3709-3718. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    FWA T F. Pavement skid resistance properties for safe aircraft operations[J]. Journal of Road Engineering, 2024, 4(4): 361-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jreng.2024.11.002
    [4]
    GARCIA J S D, JAEDICKE C, LIM G L, et al. Predicting the severity of runway excursions from aviation safety reports[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2023, 20(9): 555-564. doi: 10.2514/1.I011145
    [5]
    LEE Y. Causal factors analysis of runway excursion occurrences through fuzzy logic modeling method[J]. Transportation Engineering, 2023, 14: 100204. doi: 10.1016/j.treng.2023.100204
    [6]
    KONG Y, ZHANG X, MAHADEVAN S. Bayesian deep learning for aircraft hard landing safety assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2022, 23(10): 17062-17076. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3162566
    [7]
    齐心歌, 刘畅. 融合复杂网络与因果推断的REA风险演化研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2025, 35(9): 167-175.

    QI X G, LIU C. Research on REA risk evolution by fusing complex network and causal inference[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2025, 35(9): 167-175. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    QI X G, LIU C, FAN D, et al. Causal modeling and risk assessment of runway excursion events via interpretable machine learning[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2026, 269: 112055.
    [9]
    CHU L, LIU Y Y, FWA T F. Estimating runway overrun risks of landing aircraft[J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2024, 30(2): 04024002. doi: 10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2419
    [10]
    潘安庭, 张春阳, 许星, 等. 基于BN和TEM分析法的民机进近着陆阶段风险研究[J]. 自动化应用, 2025, 66(12): 259-262.

    PAN A T, ZHANG C Y, XU X, et al. Risk research of civil aircraft approach and landing stage based on BN and TEM analysis method[J]. Automation Application, 2025, 66(12): 259-262. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    汪磊, 李蕊君, 王菲茵. 基于QAR数据与互信息法的进近风险评估模型[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(4): 21-29. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.003

    WANG L, LI R J, WANG F Y. Approach risk assessment model based on QAR data and mutual information method[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 21-29. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.003
    [12]
    汪磊, 张楠, 高杉. 基于QAR数据与关联规则的着陆阶段超限风险评估[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2025, 51(6): 1907-1915.

    WANG L, ZHANG N, GAO S. Risk assessment of landing phase exceedance based on QAR data and association rule[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2025, 51(6): 1907-1915. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    WANG F, YUAN J, LIU X, et al. Impacts of flight operations on the risk of runway excursions[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(3): 975. doi: 10.3390/app14030975
    [14]
    崔秀芳, 曾杰熙, 邵志鹏, 等. 融合N-K-DBN模型的船舶自沉事故风险因素动态耦合分析[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(6): 2080-2091.

    CUI X F, ZENG J X, SHAO Z P, et al. Dynamic coupling analysis of risk factors in ship self-sinking accidents using the N-K-DBN model[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2025, 25(6): 2080-2091. (in Chinese)
    [15]
    卢飞, 魏星宇, 陈昊南. 民航飞行员着陆操作品质综合评价体系研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2025, 25(2): 558-571.

    LU F, WEI X Y, CHEN H N. Research on the comprehensive evaluation system of civil aviation pilot landing operation quality[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2025, 25(2): 558-571. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    王可, 邵静雯, 杨俊. 基于贝叶斯网络的某民用飞机着陆距离研究[J]. 航空工程进展, 2025, 16(2): 160-167.

    WANG K, SHAO J W, YANG J. Research on landing distance of a civil aircraft based on Bayesian network[J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2025, 16(2): 160-167. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    CHEN H, YANG M, TANG X. Association rule mining of aircraft event causes based on the Apriori algorithm[J]. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14: 13440. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64360-6
    [18]
    LU N, MENG B. Risk analysis of airplane upsets in flight: an integrated system framework and analysis methodology[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(5): 446. doi: 10.3390/aerospace10050446
    [19]
    霍小森, 杜爽, 谭琪麟, 等. 基于数据驱动贝叶斯网络的地铁施工事故致因差异化分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2025, 22(4): 1802-1814.

    HUO X S, DU S, TAN Q L, et al. Differential analysis of causes of subway construction accidents based on data-driven Bayesian networks[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2025, 22(4): 1802-1814. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    刘璐, 陈玲, 朱晓波, 等. 航空器冲偏出跑道事件关键人为因素分析方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2025, 25(22): 9640-9648.

    LIU L, CHEN L, ZHU X B, et al. Analytical method for critical human factors in the event of runway overrun and veer off[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2025, 25(22): 9640-9648. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (26) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return