Volume 43 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Jingge, AI Qiuchi, HUANG Shan, LIAN Guan. A Dynamic Pushback Control Model for Departure Flights Considering Reapplication Intervals[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 119-128. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.012
Citation: YANG Jingge, AI Qiuchi, HUANG Shan, LIAN Guan. A Dynamic Pushback Control Model for Departure Flights Considering Reapplication Intervals[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 119-128. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.012

A Dynamic Pushback Control Model for Departure Flights Considering Reapplication Intervals

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.012
  • Received Date: 2025-02-18
  • Long taxiway queues during the departure process of flights at large hub airports will cause large fuel consumption and exhaust emissions. Aiming to tackle this problem, an improved N-control linear policy (NCLP) with multiple application intervals is proposed based on the traditional N-Control strategy. The model can gradually reduce the flight exit permission rate when the real-time queue length exceeds the set/predefined/configured optimal taxiway queue length threshold, achieving more flexible dynamic departure control. The taxiway queuing system and boarding gate virtual queuing system are built by setting the intervals for flight resubmission equal to the runway service time. A comprehensive cost objective function for taxiway fuel consumption and boarding gate occupancy penalty is constructed. A continuous time Markov chain based optimization algorithm is proposed to achieve a dual loop between taxiway capacity and dynamic pushback control strategy, thus determining the optimal taxiway queue threshold between fuel consumption and gate penalty cost. A simulation experiment is conducted on the actual operating data of Beijing Capital International Airport. The results show that when the length of the taxiway queue reaches the optimal threshold, the NCLP control strategy has significant advantages over the uncontrolled situation and the traditional N-Control strategy. This model can reduce the average taxi waiting time from 9.51 min to 6.94 min throughout the day, and reduce fuel consumption and total operating costs by 27.07% and 23.91% respectively compared with the N-Control strategy, which verifies the effectiveness of the proposed model in reducing airport taxi fuel consumption.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    EVERTSE C, VISSER H G. Real-time airport surface movement planning: minimizing aircraft emissions[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 79: 224-241. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.03.018
    [2]
    DÖNMEZ K. Airport Ground Optimizer(AGO): a decision support system initiative for air traffic controllers with optimization and decision-aid algorithms[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2024, 119: 102648. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102648
    [3]
    SIMAIAKIS I, SANDBERG M, BALAKRISHNAN H. Dynamic control of airport departures: Algorithm development and field evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2014, 15(1): 285-295. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2278484
    [4]
    HAO L, RYERSON M S, KANG L, et al. Estimating fuel burn impacts of taxi-out delay with implications for gate-hold benefits[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 80: 454-466. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.05.015
    [5]
    PUJET N, ODONI A R, DELAWARE F. Input-output modeling and control of the departure process of congested airports[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2000, 8(1): 1-32. doi: 10.2514/atcq.8.1.1
    [6]
    ZHANG J, WANG L. Application of dynamic pushback control strategy in an international airport[J]. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 2022, 10(2), 789-797.
    [7]
    BALAKRISHNA P, GANESAN R, SHERRY L. Accuracy of reinforcement learning algorithms for predicting aircraft taxi-out times: a case-study of Tampa Bay departures[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2010, 18(6): 950-962. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2010.03.003
    [8]
    LIAN G, ZHANG Y, DESAI J, et al. Predicting taxi-out time at congested airports with optimization-based support vector regression Methods[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018(1): 7509508.
    [9]
    SIMAIAKIS I, BALAKRISHNAN H. A queuing model of the airport departure process[J]. Transportation Science, 2016, 50 (1): 94-109. doi: 10.1287/trsc.2015.0603
    [10]
    BAO J, KANG J, ZHANG J, et al. A dynamic control method for airport ground movement optimization considering adaptive traffic situation and data-driven conflict priority[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2025, 124: 102753.
    [11]
    FERNANDES H F, MÜLLER C. Optimization of the waiting time and makespan in aircraft departures: a real-time non-iterative sequencing model[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2019, 79: 101686. doi: 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101686
    [12]
    刘丽华, 张亚平, 邢志伟, 等. 基于离散差分进化的飞机推出决策优化[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2016, 16(6): 196-203.

    LIU L H, ZHANG Y P, XING Z W, et al. Optimization of aircraft launch decision based on discrete difference evolution[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2016, 16(6): 196-203. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    LI H, CHEN Z. Integration of pushback control system with other airport systems[J]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2023, 108: 102345.
    [14]
    BURGAIN P, PINON O J, FERON E, et al. Optimizing pushback decisions to valuate airport surface surveillance information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(1): 180-192. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2011.2166388
    [15]
    SANDBERG M J, SIMAIAKIS I, BALAKRISHNAN H, et al. A decision support tool for the pushback rate control of airport departures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 2014, 44(3): 416-421. doi: 10.1109/THMS.2014.2305906
    [16]
    张亚平, 刘丽华, 郝斯琪, 等. 基于弹性滑行容量的飞机有效推出时隙研究[J]. 武汉理工大学学报, 2016, 40(6): 937-942.

    ZHANG Y P, LIU L H, HAO S Q, XING Z W. Research on effective aircraft rollout time slot based on elastic taxiing capacity[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 2016, 40(6): 937-942. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    赵向领, 唐建勋, 卢飞, 等. 基于改进离散差分算法的航班延迟推出策略分析[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2015, 15 (6): 114-120.

    ZHAO X L, TANG J X, LU F, HAN B, et al. Analysis of flight delay introduction strategy based on improved discrete difference algorithm[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2015, 15(6): 114-120. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    DESAI J, LIAN G, SRIVATHSAN S. Dynamic departure pushback control at airports: part a-linear penalty-based algorithms and policies[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2024, 71 (7): 22189.
    [19]
    廉冠, 张亚平, 邢志伟, 等. 飞机动态推出控制策略仿真优化模型[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2018, 50(6): 776-782.

    LIAN G, ZHANG Y P, XING Z W, et al. Simulation optimization model for aircraft dynamic rollout control strategy[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2018, 50(6): 776-782. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    LIAN G, WU Y, LUO W, et al. A two-stage optimization method for multi-runway departure sequencing based on continuous-time Markov chain[J]. Aerospace, 2025, 12(4): 12040273.
    [21]
    朱承元, 白锴迪, 赵志刚. 考虑空域时空特性的动态多跑道使用策略优化方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(01): 94-104. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.01.011

    ZHU C Y, BAI K D, ZHAO Z G. Optimization of dynamic multi-runway use strategy considering spatio-temporal characteristics of airspace[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(1): 94-104. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.01.011
    [22]
    KANG J, BAO J, ZHANG Z, et al. Dynamic routing and scheduling approach for aircraft taxi automation with adaptive surface situation[J]. Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, 2025, 22(3): 189-201. doi: 10.2514/1.I011486
    [23]
    WANG X, BROWNLEE A E, WEISZER M, et al A chance-constrained programming model for airport ground movement optimisation with taxi time uncertainties[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2021, 132: 103382. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103382
    [24]
    ALI H, PHAM D T, ALAM S. Toward greener and sustainable airside operations: a deep reinforcement learning approach to pushback rate control for mixed-mode runways[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2024, 25(11): 18354-18367. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3433428
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (2) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return