Volume 43 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SHANG Ranran, HU Minghua, YANG Lei, REN Yumeng, LI Yangjie. A Methodology for Macroscopic Airspace Traffic Risk Modeling and Assessment under Manned-unmanned Integrated Operations[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 24-36. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.003
Citation: SHANG Ranran, HU Minghua, YANG Lei, REN Yumeng, LI Yangjie. A Methodology for Macroscopic Airspace Traffic Risk Modeling and Assessment under Manned-unmanned Integrated Operations[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 24-36. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.003

A Methodology for Macroscopic Airspace Traffic Risk Modeling and Assessment under Manned-unmanned Integrated Operations

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.003
  • Received Date: 2025-01-21
  • Integrating manned and unmanned aircraft into shared airspace presents significant challenges to airspace safety assessment. Existing risk assessment studies primarily focus on tactical collision risk evaluation based on trajectory prediction, while strategic-level systematic risk assessment for airspace planning and design remains underdeveloped. To comprehensively evaluate airspace safety levels and support the safe large-scale integration of unmanned aircraft into controlled airspace, this study investigates a macroscopic traffic risk modeling and assessment method for integrated operations. Static risk indicators are constructed based on the structural characteristics of routes and intersections, incorporating geometric morphology and conflict-prone profiles. Dynamic risk indicators are proposed in both horizontal and vertical dimensions, based on traffic flow characteristics. By coupling static complexity with dynamic conflict risks, an integrated airspace traffic risk assessment model is established, reflecting both the static features of the airspace structure and the dynamic characteristics of aircraft operations. Using four sector areas in Shanghai as an example, a risk assessment is conducted under manned aircraft operational scenarios to validate the model's feasibility and effectiveness, and to determine the target safety level for the airspace. Simulation experiments are designed to explore the influence mechanism of the three parameters, speed difference, separation, and mix ratio, on risk under integrated operation. Based on the criterion of not exceeding the target safety level, an equivalent risk assessment approach is adopted to determine the feasibility of manned-unmanned integrated operations. The allowable number of unmanned aircraft that can be introduced into each manned route is evaluated. The results show that: ①Speed difference and separation are the core driving factors of risk. The influence of mix ratio on airspace traffic risk depends on the separation setting. When the minimum safety separation between manned and unmanned aircraft is significantly larger than that between manned aircraft or between unmanned aircraft, the risk peaks when unmanned aircraft account for about50% of the traffic mix. ②Complex interactions are observed among speed difference, separation, and mix ratio, with no additional higher-order coupling effects detected. ③High -risk initial periods are not conducive to the introduction of unmanned aircraft.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ICAO. Aviation system block upgrades[EB/OL]. (2016-07) [2024-12-16]. https://www.icao.int/airnavigation/Documents/ASBU_2016-FINAL.pdf.
    [2]
    EASA. Advance NPA 2015-10: Introduction of a regulatory framework for the operation of drones[EB/OL]. (2015-07-31)[2025-01-16]. https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/notices-of-proposed-amendment/npa-2015-10.
    [3]
    FAA. Order 8130.34D-Airworthiness certification of unmanned aircraft systems and optionally piloted aircraft[EB/ OL]. (2017-09-08)[2024-12-16]. https://www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/order/faa_order_8130.34d.pdf.
    [4]
    CORDÓN R R, NIETO F J S, REJADO C C. RPAS integration in non-segregated airspace: the SESAR approach system interfaces needed for integration[J]. Fourth SESAR Innovation Days, 2014: 25-27.
    [5]
    PÉREZ-CASTÁN J A, GÓMEZ COMENDADOR F, ARNALDO-VALDÉS R M, et al. Conflict-resolution algorithms for separation minima definition of RPAS in a non-segregated airspace[C]. 7th EASN International Conference, Warsaw, Poland: Warsaw University of Technology, 2017.
    [6]
    刘厚荣. 固定翼无人机与通航飞机低空融合运行间隔与容量研究[D]. 广汉: 中国民用航空飞行学院, 2024.

    LIU H R. Research on the low-altitude fusion operation interval and capacity of fixed-wing UAV and general aviation aircraft[D]. Guanghan: Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2024. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    李楠, 孙廪实, 焦庆宇, 等. 无人机安全间隔的确定方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(26): 11463-11472.

    LI N, SUN L S, JIAO Q Y, et al. The method for determining the safety separation of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(26): 11463-11472. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    ARAD B A. The controller load and sector design[J]. Journal of Air Traffic Control, 1964, (5): 12-31.
    [9]
    PEJOVIC T, NATJASOV F, CRNOGORAC D. Relationship between air traffic demand, safety and complexity in high density airspace in Europe[C]. ICSC-ISATECH Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University of Applied Science, 2020.
    [10]
    MOGFORD R H, GUTTMAN J A, MORROW S L, et al. The complexity construct in air traffic control: a review and synthesis of the literature, DOT/FAA/CT-TN95/22[R]. Springfield, Virginia: FAA, 1995.
    [11]
    吴哲. 基于复杂度的空域繁忙等级划分研究[D]. 南京: 南京航空航天大学, 2019.

    WU Z. Research on busy level classification of airspace based on complexity[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    ZHANG Z Y, ZHANG J, WANG P, et al. Research on operation of UAVs in non-isolated airspace[J]. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2018, 57(1): 151-166.
    [13]
    杨敏. 无人机与民航客机碰撞安全风险评估[D]. 广汉: 中国民用航空飞行学院, 2019.

    YANG M. Safety risk assessment of collision between UAV and civil aircraft[D]. Guanghan: Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    艾毅, 万琪峰, 韩珣, 等. 面向复杂空域的多航空器交互风险评估方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(3): 1-10. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.001

    AI Y, WAN Q F, HAN X, et al. A risk assessment method of multi-aircraft interaction for complex airspace[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 1-10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.001
    [15]
    杨锦, 杭旭, 王艳军. 机场管制空域内无人机运行安全风险评估[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(11): 418-431.

    YANG J, HANG X, WANG Y J. Safety risk assessment of UAVs operations in airport controlled airspace[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(11): 418-431. (in Chinese)
    [16]
    ZHANG N, LIU H, NG B F, et al. Collision probability between intruding drone and commercial aircraft in airport restricted area based on collision-course trajectory planning[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 120: 102736. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102736
    [17]
    童亮, 甘旭升, 张宏宏, 等. 考虑多因素影响的无人机碰撞风险评估[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2023, 44(4): 282-289.

    TONG L, GAN X S, ZHANG H H, et al. Risk assessment of UAV collision considering multiple factors[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2023, 44(4): 282-289. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    NETJASOV F. Framework for airspace planning and design based on conflict risk assessment: Part 1: Conflict risk assessment model for airspace strategic planning[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2012, 24: 190-212. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2012.03.002
    [19]
    PÉREZ-CASTÁN J A, GÓMEZ COMENDADOR F, RODRÍGUEZ-SANZ A, et al. RPAS conflict-risk assessment in non-segregated airspace[J]. Safety Science, 2019, 111: 7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.018
    [20]
    PÉREZ-CASTÁN J A, RODRÍGUEZ-SANZ A. Risk Assessment in air traffic management[M]. London: IntechOpen, 2020.
    [21]
    YANG L, HAN K, BORST C, et al. Impact of aircraft speed heterogeneity on contingent flow control in 4D en-route operation[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 119: 102746. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102746
    [22]
    YANG L, HUANG J, GAO Q, et al. Dynamic boundary optimization of free route airspace sectors[J]. Aerospace, 2022, 9 (12): 832-861. doi: 10.3390/aerospace9120832
    [23]
    郭萍. 有交互影响的三因素方差分析的应用及MATLAB实现[J]. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 31(3): 252-256.

    GUO P. Application of Three-Factor ANOVA with interaction and MATLAB implementation[J]. Journal of Shenyang University(Natural Science), 2019, 31(3): 252-256. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(12)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (5) PDF downloads(0) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return