Volume 43 Issue 4
Aug.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HAN Xiao, TANG Yuan, SHENG Xiaolu, FANG Kexin, XING Yingying. A Review on Vulnerable Road Users' Attitudes Toward Autonomous Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 1-13. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.001
Citation: HAN Xiao, TANG Yuan, SHENG Xiaolu, FANG Kexin, XING Yingying. A Review on Vulnerable Road Users' Attitudes Toward Autonomous Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(4): 1-13. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.001

A Review on Vulnerable Road Users' Attitudes Toward Autonomous Vehicles

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.04.001
  • Received Date: 2024-08-14
  • The widespread adoption of autonomous driving technology depends not only on technological progress but also on public attitudes. In real-world operations, autonomous vehicles inevitably interact with vulnerable road users, including pedestrians, cyclists, elderly people, children, and persons with disabilities. Investigating these groups' attitudes toward autonomous driving and the factors that shape them is crucial for fostering social acceptance and ensuring the safe deployment of this technology. This review outlines the potential advantages of autonomous vehicles. It focuses on the attitudes of vulnerable road users and their influencing factors, aiming to provide guidance for researchers, technology developers, and policymakers in technological improvement and policy design. The findings indicate that most vulnerable road users generally hold positive attitudes toward autonomous vehicles. Younger male pedestrians and cyclists show stronger support. Persons with disabilities view them as opportunities for enhanced mobility, whereas older adults, due to lower adaptability, tend to prefer conventional vehicles. Familiarity with the technology further improves acceptance. Nevertheless, safety and reliability remain critical barriers to trust. Pedestrians and cyclists worry about road interaction risks. Persons with disabilities are concerned about design flaws and loss of independence. Older adults feel uneasy about interacting with new technologies, and parents express concerns over child safety features. The review also summarizes policy measures and practices in several countries aimed at protecting vulnerable road users, offering lessons for safety assurance in the era of autonomous driving. Finally, it highlights future research directions, including expanding study populations and geographical scope, adopting experiential research methods, conducting longitudinal studies, applying latent class analysis to identify subgroup differences, and differentiating between technical levels and operational models. These efforts will advance the understanding of how vulnerable road users' attitudes evolve and provide valuable insights for technology development and policy refinement.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Automated driving systems 2.0: a vision for safety[R]. Washington, D. C. : U.S. Department of Transportation, 2017.
    [2]
    何毅. 汽车自动驾驶技术原理及应用研究[J]. 汽车与配件, 2023(1): 64-66.

    HE Y. Research on the principles and applications of autonomous driving technology[J]. Automobiles and Accessories, 2023(1): 64-66. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    朱正吉. 车联网技术在自动驾驶汽车设计中的应用[J]. 汽车测试报告, 2023(10): 41-43.

    ZHU Z J. Application of internet of vehicles technology in autonomous vehicle design[J]. Automotive Test Report, 2023 (10): 41-43. (in Chinese)
    [4]
    胡笳, 罗书源, 赖金涛, 等. 自动驾驶对交通运输系统规划的影响综述[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2021, 21(5): 52.

    HU J, LUO S Y, LAI J T, et al. A review of the impact of autonomous driving on transportation planning[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2021, 21(5): 52. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    KYRIAKIDIS M, HAPPEE R, DE WINTER J C. Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5 000 respondents[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 32: 127-140. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
    [6]
    CHOI J K, JI Y G. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2015, 31(10): 692-702. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
    [7]
    BANSAL P, KOCKELMAN K M. Forecasting Americans' long-term adoption of connected and autonomous vehicle technologies[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2017, 95: 49-63. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013
    [8]
    SCHOETTLE B, SIVAK M. Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the US, the UK, and Australia[R]. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute, 2014.
    [9]
    郑新夷, 倪正山, 林依婷. 我国自动驾驶汽车的使用意愿探究[J]. 福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2023, 37(2): 133-143.

    ZHENG X Y, NI Z S, LIN Y T. Exploring the willingness to use autonomous vehicles in China[J]. Journal of Fuzhou University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 37 (2): 133-143. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    VANLAAR W, HING M M, BROWN S, et al. Fatal and serious injuries related to vulnerable road users in Canada[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2016, 58: 67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.07.001
    [11]
    MERSKY A C, SAMARAS C. Fuel economy testing of autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2016, 65: 31-48. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.001
    [12]
    MASSAR M, REZA I, RAHMAN S M, et al. Impacts of autonomous vehicles on greenhouse gas emissions: positive or negative?[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(11): 5567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115567
    [13]
    National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Fatal analysis reporting system[R]. Washington, D. C. : U.S. Department of Transportation, 2012.
    [14]
    GOUMIRI S, YAHIAOUI S, DJAHEL S. Smart mobility in smart cities: emerging challenges, recent advances and future directions[J]. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2025, 29(1): 81-117. doi: 10.1080/15472450.2023.2245750
    [15]
    RAHMAN M T, DEY K, DAS S, et al. Sharing the road with autonomous vehicles: a qualitative analysis of the perceptions of pedestrians and bicyclists[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2021, 78: 433-445. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.008
    [16]
    DEB S, STRAWDERMAN L, CARRUTH D W, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 84: 178-195. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.029
    [17]
    PAYRE W, CESTAC J, DELHOMME P. Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
    [18]
    DAS S, DUTTA A, FITZPATRICK K. Technological perception on autonomous vehicles: perspectives of the non-motorists[J]. TechnologyAnalysis&StrategicManagement, 2020, 32 (11): 1335-1352.
    [19]
    RAHMAN M T, DEY K, PYRIALAKOU V D, et al. Factors influencing safety perceptions of sharing roadways with autonomous vehicles among vulnerable roadway users[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2023, 85: 266-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.02.010
    [20]
    PENMETSA P, ADANU E K, WOOD D, et al. Perceptions and expectations of autonomous vehicles: a snapshot of vulnerable road user opinion[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 143: 9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.010
    [21]
    MFINANGA D A. Implication of pedestrians' stated preference of certain attributes of crosswalks[J]. Transport Policy, 2014, 32: 156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.01.011
    [22]
    BLAU M, AKAR G, NASAR J. Driverless vehicles' potential influence on bicyclist facility preferences[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2018, 12(9): 665-674. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1425781
    [23]
    Bike Pittsburgh. AV survey results 2019[R]. Pittsburgh: Bike Pittsburgh, 2019.
    [24]
    REIG S, NORMAN S, MORALES C G, et al. A field study of pedestrians and autonomous vehicles[C]. The 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, New York: ACM, 2018.
    [25]
    HULSE L M. Pedestrians' perceived vulnerability and observed behaviours relating to crossing and passing interactions with autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2023, 93: 34-54 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2022.12.007
    [26]
    XING Y Y, ZHOU H Y, HAN X, et al. What influences vulnerable road users' perceptions of autonomous vehicles? A comparative analysis of the 2017 and 2019 Pittsburgh surveys[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 176: 121454. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121454
    [27]
    杨润. 高度自动与完全自动驾驶汽车的公众接受度研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2017.

    YANG R. Research on public acceptance of highly automated and fully autonomous vehicles[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2017. (in Chinese)
    [28]
    杨洁, 沈梦洁. 中国自动驾驶汽车消费市场接受度调查[J]. 长安大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 19(6): 34-42.

    YANG J, SHEN M J. Survey on the consumer market acceptance of autonomous vehicles in China[J]. Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition), 2017, 19(6): 34-42. (in Chinese)
    [29]
    PATTINSON J A, CHEN H, BASU S, et al. I can do anything with my AV data(but I won't do that): public attitudes towards data recorders in self-driving cars[C]. The Second International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, Austin: ACM, 2024.
    [30]
    CLAYPOOL H, BIN-NUN A, GERLACH J. Self-driving cars: the impact on people with disabilities[R]. Newton: Ruderman Family Foundation, 2017.
    [31]
    BENNETT R, VIJAYGOPAL R, KOTTASZ R. Willingness of people with mental health disabilities to travel in driverless vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2019, 12: 1-12.
    [32]
    BENNETT R, VIJAYGOPAL R. Exploring mobility and transportation technology futures for people with ambulatory disabilities: a science fiction prototype[J]. Technovation, 2024, 133: 103001. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103001
    [33]
    BENNETT R, VIJAYGOPAL R, KOTTASZ R. Willingness of people who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: an empirical investigation[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 69: 13-27. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.12.012
    [34]
    BRINKLEY J, HUFF JR E W, POSADAS B, et al. Exploring the needs, preferences, and concerns of persons with visual impairments regarding autonomous vehicles[J]. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 2020, 13(1): 1-34.
    [35]
    KEMPAPIDIS T, CASTLE C L, FAIRCHILD R G, et al. A scientific evaluation of autonomous vehicle user experience on sighted and visually impaired passengers based on FACS (facial analysis coding system)and a user experience questionnaire[J]. Journal of Transport & Health, 2020, 19: 100906.
    [36]
    CHEN J C, LIU Y, WANG Z, et al. Toward sustainable intelligent transportation systems in 2050: fairness and eco-responsibility[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2023, 8(2): 1234-1245.
    [37]
    LIU D X, ZHANG H, WANG Q, et al. Vision-assisted autonomous lower-limb exoskeleton robot[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2021, 51(7): 4256-4268.
    [38]
    LI S J, WANG Y, ZHANG J, et al. TA-Unet: integrating triplet attention module for drivable road region segmentation[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(9): 3257. doi: 10.3390/s22093257
    [39]
    SIVAKANTHAN S, DICIANNO B E, KOONTZ A, et al. Accessible autonomous transportation and services: Design considerations from the perspective of consumers and providers[J]. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2024, 105(8): 1536-1544. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.04.009
    [40]
    HARKIN K A, HARKIN A M, GOEGEL C, et al. How do vulnerable road users evaluate automated vehicles in urban traffic? A focus group study with pedestrians, cyclists, e-scooter riders, older adults, and people with walking disabilities[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2024, 104: 59-71. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2024.05.017
    [41]
    PAYRE W, CESTAC J, DELHOMME P. Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2014, 27: 252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
    [42]
    DEB S, STRAWDERMAN L, CARRUTH D W, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess pedestrian receptivity toward fully autonomous vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2017, 84: 178-195. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.029
    [43]
    DOULABI S, HASSAN H M, LI B. Senior Americans' perceptions, attitudes, and safety concerns toward autonomous vehicles[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2023, 84: 218-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.022
    [44]
    LAJUNEN T, SULLMAN M J M. Attitudes toward four levels of self-driving technology among elderly drivers[J]. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12: 682973. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682973
    [45]
    RÖDEL C, STADLER S, MESCHTSCHERJAKOV A, et al. Towards autonomous cars: the effect of autonomy levels on acceptance and user experience[C]. The 6th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Seattle: ACM, 2014
    [46]
    RAHMAN M M, DEB S, STRAWDERMAN L, et al. How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 65: 242-257. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.002
    [47]
    TREMOULET P D, SEACRIST T, WARD MCINTOSH C, et al. Transporting children in autonomous vehicles: an exploratory study[J]. Human Factors, 2020, 62(2): 278-287. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853993
    [48]
    LEE Y C, MIRMAN J H. Parents' perspectives on using autonomous vehicles to enhance children's mobility[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 96: 415-431. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.001
    [49]
    CHINEN K, MATSUMOTO M, KIM J, et al. Navigating the landscape of autonomous buses: insights in Ibaraki, Japan[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(8): 3351. doi: 10.3390/su16083351
    [50]
    PARK J, ZAHABI M, RAHMAN M M, et al. Automated vehicles for older adults with cognitive impairment: a survey study[J]. Ergonomics, 2024, 67(6): 831-848. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2024.2302020
    [51]
    景鹏, 王伟, 吴麟麟. 老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(6): 158-171.

    JING P, WANG W, WU L L. Acceptance of autonomous vehicles for the elderly[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(6): 158-171. (in Chinese)
    [52]
    MA Y, LI S, QIN S, et al. Factors affecting trust in the autonomous vehicle: a survey of primary school students and parent perceptions[C]. IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications(TrustCom), Guangzhou: IEEE, 2020.
    [53]
    KUHN M, REIT V, SCHWING M, et al. Let the driver off the hook? Moral decisions of autonomous cars and their impact on consumer well-being[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2024, 189: 104224. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104224
    [54]
    ZHANG B L, SHEN L, YAO J H, et al. Automatic tracking based on weighted fusion back propagation in UWB for IoT devices[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(4): 1257. doi: 10.3390/s24041257
    [55]
    MAYORAL R M, HELMI A, LOGAN S W, et al. GoBot Go! Using a custom assistive robot to promote physical activity in children[J]. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, 2024(12): 613-621.
    [56]
    DOULABI S, HASSAN H M, LI B. Senior Americans' perceptions, attitudes, and safety concerns toward autonomous vehicles[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 2023, 84: 218-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.022
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (5) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return