Volume 43 Issue 3
Jun.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yanfeng, ZHANG Yu, ZHAO Xiaohua, YANG Yanqun. Evaluation of Comprehensive Utility of Connected HUD Warning System Based on Combination Weighting Method[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(3): 74-84. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.03.008
Citation: WANG Yanfeng, ZHANG Yu, ZHAO Xiaohua, YANG Yanqun. Evaluation of Comprehensive Utility of Connected HUD Warning System Based on Combination Weighting Method[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(3): 74-84. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.03.008

Evaluation of Comprehensive Utility of Connected HUD Warning System Based on Combination Weighting Method

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.03.008
  • Received Date: 2024-12-01
    Available Online: 2025-10-11
  • To solve the problem of single evaluation dimensions and insufficient quantification of the effectiveness of head-up display (HUD) warning systems, a driving simulation platform is developed to design and develop urban road pedestrian crossing connected experimental scenarios and three warning systems (baseline/head-down display (HDD)/HUD). The experimental tests obtained visual and behavioral data of drivers. Based on human factors engineering, systems engineering theory, and traffic engineering, combined with the actual needs of drivers for HUD warning systems, a comprehensive evaluation index system is established by extracting 10 typical key indicators from the four dimensions of system safety, reliability, stability, and efficiency, including braking response time, post encroachment time, maximum pupil area, average distraction index, and recovery speed. The subjective and objective weighting method based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) - entropy weight method (EWM) is used to determine the combined weights of the evaluation index system. Finally, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to quantify the single dimensional utility and comprehensive utility of the three warning systems in pedestrian crossing incidents. The results of single dimensional utility show that there are differences in the utility performance of HDD and HUD in four dimensions, and single dimensional quantification cannot comprehensively evaluate the utility of warning systems. Specifically, the HDD and HUD systems have improved their security scores by 6.25% and 18.98% respectively compared to the Baseline conditions; In terms of reliability, HDD slightly decreased by 0.61%, while HUD increased by 1.97%; In terms of stability, HDD and HUD scores increased by 5.97% and 10.99%, respectively; In terms of efficiency, HDD and HUD scores decreased by 2.47% and 3.5% respectively, with HUD performing relatively poorly. The comprehensive utility results indicate that in pedestrian crossing incidents, the comprehensive utility values of HDD and HUD systems increased by 1.86% and 6.36% respectively compared to Baseline conditions. In comparison, HUD has more advantages in balancing safety, reliability, stability, and efficiency, but the design of HUD warning systems in the future still needs to focus on balancing the relationship between safety and efficiency.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    王长帅, 邵永成, 朱彤, 等. 城市道路中间路段人车冲突中网联预警信息对驾驶行为的影响[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(4): 81-89. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.009

    WANG C S, SHAO Y C, ZHU T, et al. Impacts of connected warning information on driver behavior in pedestrian-vehicle conflict at the mid-block of urban roads[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 81-89. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.009
    [2]
    ALI Y, SHARMA A, HAQUE M M, et al. The impact of the connected environment on driving behavior and safety: a driving simulator study[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 144: 105643.
    [3]
    LI X, RONG J, LI Z, et al. Modeling drivers'acceptance of augmented reality head-up display in connected environment[J]. Displays, 2022, 75: 102307. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2022.102307
    [4]
    TRETTEN P, GÄRLING A, NILSSON R, et al. An on-road study of head-up display: preferred location and acceptance levels[C]. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, California, USA: SAGE Publications, 2011.
    [5]
    LIU Y C, WEN M H. Comparison of head-up display(HUD) vs. head-down display(HDD): driving performance of commercial vehicle operators in Taiwan[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2004, 61(5): 679-697. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.06.002
    [6]
    WITTMANN M, KISS M, GUGG P, et al. Effects of display position of a visual in-vehicle task on simulated driving[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2006, 37(2): 187-199. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.002
    [7]
    EYRAUD R, ZIBETTI E, BACCINO T. Allocation of visual attention while driving with simulated augmented reality[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2015, 32: 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.011
    [8]
    HWANG Y, PARK B J, KIM K H. Effects of Augmented-reality head-up display system use on risk perception and psychological changes of drivers[J]. Etri Journal, 2016, 38(4): 757-766.
    [9]
    LI R, CHEN Y V, ZHANG L, et al. Effects of perception of head-up display on the driving safety of experienced and inexperienced drivers[J]. Displays, 2020, 64: 101962. doi: 10.1016/j.displa.2020.101962
    [10]
    YANG Z, SHI J, ZHANG Y, et al. Head-up display graphic warning system facilitates simulated driving performance[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 35(9): 796-803. doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1496970
    [11]
    WU, Y, ABDEL-ATY, M, PARK, J, ZHU, J. Effects of crash warning systems on rear-end crash avoidance behavior under fog conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2018, 95: 481-492. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.001
    [12]
    WINKLER S, KAZAZI J, VOLLRATH M. How to warn drivers in various safety-critical situations-different strategies, different reactions[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 117: 410-426.
    [13]
    BRIJS T, MAURIELLO F, MONTELLA A, et al. Studying the effects of an advanced driver-assistance system to improve safety of cyclists overtaking[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 174: 106763.
    [14]
    YE C, WANG X, MORRIS A, et al. Pedestrian crash causation analysis and active safety system calibration[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2024, 195: 107404.
    [15]
    WHO. Global status report on road safety[R/OL]. (2023-12-13)[2025-6-28]. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240086517
    [16]
    杜昊天, 陈丰, 李琛, 等. 低能见度下人行横道发光标线视认及预警效果研究[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(2): 59-66. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.02.006

    DU H T, CHEN F, LI C, et al. An evaluation for impacts of illuminating crosswalk markings on driving safety under low visibility conditions[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(2): 59-66. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.02.006
    [17]
    Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. ACI-ISTAT incidenti stradali 2017[R/OL]. (2019-09-17)[2025-06-28]. https://www.istat.it/it/files//2018/07/Incidenti-stradali_2017.
    [18]
    YUE L, ABDEL-ATY M, WU Y, et al. Influence of pedestrian-to-vehicle technology on drivers'response and safety benefits considering pre-crash conditions[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2020, 73: 50-65. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.012
    [19]
    HAQUE M M, OVIEDO-TRESPALACIOS O, SHARMA A, et al. Examining the driver-pedestrian interaction at pedestrian crossings in the connected environment: a hazard-based duration modelling approach[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 150: 33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.014
    [20]
    WINKLER S, KAZAZI J, VOLLRATH M. Distractive or supportive-how warnings in the head-up display affect drivers'gaze and driving behavior[C]. 18th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Canary Islands, SPAIN: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 2015.
    [21]
    HAJISEYEDJAVADI F, ZHANG T, AGRAWAL R, et al. Effectiveness of visual warnings on young drivers hazard anticipation and hazard mitigation abilities[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 116: 41-52.
    [22]
    LARGE D R, KIM H, MERENDA C, et al. Investigating the effect of urgency and modality of pedestrian alert warnings on driver acceptance and performance[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2019, 60: 11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.028
    [23]
    文晗. 基于情境感知的汽车人机交互界面设计研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2016.

    WEN H. Study on automotive human machine interface design based on context awareness[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    张桂伟. 车载平视显示器HUD视觉交互界面设计研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2015.

    ZHANG G W. The design research of head-up display interface interaction[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2015. (in Chinese)
    [25]
    边扬, 张钰, 赵晓华, 等. 行人过街事件网联HUD预警系统对驾驶行为的影响[J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(4): 114-125.

    BIAN Y, ZHANG Y, ZHAO X H, et al. Effect of Connected HUD warning system on driving behavior for pedestrian crossing events[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52 (4): 114-125. (in Chinese)
    [26]
    ZHAO X, CHEN H, LI H, et al. Development and application of connected vehicle technology test platform based on driving simulator: case study[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 161: 106330.
    [27]
    KIRCHER K, AHLSTRÖM C. The driver distraction detection algorithm AttenD[M]. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2017.
    [28]
    梁海峰, 刘子嫣. 基于AHP-熵权法-模糊综合分析的智能配电网综合效益评估[J]. 华北电力大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 50(1): 48-55.

    LIANG H F, LIU Z Y. Comprehensive benefit evaluation of smart distribution network based on analytic hierarchy process-entropy method-fuzzy comprehensive analysis[J]. Journal of North China Electric Power University(Natural Science Edition), 2023, 50(1): 48-55. (in Chinese)
    [29]
    赵浩威, 钟鸣, 李林锋, 等. 基于改进组合赋权的港口自洽能源系统规划方案综合评价方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(5): 148-162. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.05.014

    ZHAO H W, ZHONG M, LI L F, et al. A Comprehensive evaluation method for the planning of self-sufficient energy system for ports based on improved composite weighting[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(5): 148-162. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.05.014
    [30]
    周全超, 张洪清, 焦扬, 等. 基于组合赋权法的煤层顶板突水危险性评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(9): 3497-3503.

    ZHOU Q C, ZHANG H Q, JIAO Y, et al. Evaluation of the risk of water inrush from coal roof based on combination weighting method[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(9): 3497-3503. (in Chinese)
    [31]
    赵晓华, 鞠云杰, 李佳, 等. 基于驾驶行为和视觉特性的长大隧道突起路标作用效果评估[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33 (6): 29-41.

    ZHAO X H, JUN Y J, LI J, et al. Evaluation of the effect of RPMs in extra-long tunnels based on driving behavior and visual characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(6): 29-41. (in Chinese)
    [32]
    WICKENS C D, DIXON S R, SEPPELT B. Auditory preemption versus multiple resources: who wins in interruption management?[C]. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, California, USA: SAGE Publications, 2005.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (24) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return