Volume 43 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Houxin, LU Liping, QIN Heng, YANG Ao, CHU Duanfeng. Driving Collision Risk Modeling with Trajectory Prediction of Obstacle Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(1): 42-51. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.01.004
Citation: YANG Houxin, LU Liping, QIN Heng, YANG Ao, CHU Duanfeng. Driving Collision Risk Modeling with Trajectory Prediction of Obstacle Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(1): 42-51. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.01.004

Driving Collision Risk Modeling with Trajectory Prediction of Obstacle Vehicles

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.01.004
  • Received Date: 2024-06-18
    Available Online: 2025-06-27
  • In order to address critical challenges in intelligent driving systems, including insufficient dynamic interaction modeling, limited accuracy in multimodal trajectory prediction, and over-reliance on single physical metrics for collision risk quantification. A proactive collision risk assessment framework is proposed by integrating probabilistic quantification with multimodal trajectory prediction. For trajectory prediction, a hierarchical graph attention network is developed to capture dynamic environmental features through adaptive fusion of high-definition maps, lane geometries, and vehicle motion history. A sliding window-optimized decoder is introduced within the conventional two-stage prediction architecture to refine trajectory outputs. For risk assessment, a probabilistic collision quantification method is designed to calculate collision likelihood between ego and surrounding vehicles based on predicted trajectories. Results on the Argoverse dataset demonstrate state-of-the-art performance with minimum final displacement error (=0.785), average displacement error (=1.157), and miss rate (=0.126), achieving 1% and 15.1% error reduction in endpoint prediction compared to HiVT and LaneGCN respectively. simulation of urban mobility, SUMO simulations reveal 5% deviation between predicted and actual risks, with risk fluctuation amplitude reduced by 33.3% and 18.75% against time to collision (TTC) and dynamic safety index (DSI) methods. The proposed model shows enhanced stability in continuous driving scenarios (risk fluctuation=0.3) and demonstrates superior accuracy in forecasting potential collision risks through systematic integration of trajectory prediction and probabilistic analysis. These findings validate the framework's effectiveness in proactive safety warning for intelligent vehicles.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    JIYANG G, CHEN S, HANG Z, et al. VectorNet: encoding HD maps and agent dynamics from vectorized representation[C]. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), Seattle, USA: IEEE, 2020.
    [2]
    ZHAO H, GAO J, LAN T, et al. Tnt: Target-driven trajectory prediction[C]. Conference on Robot Learning, London, UK: PMLR, 2021.
    [3]
    GU J, SUN C, ZHAO H. Densetnt: end-to-end trajectory prediction from dense goal sets[C]. The IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, Canada: IEEE, 2021.
    [4]
    LIANG M, YANG B, HU R, et al. Learning lane graph representations for motion forecasting[C]. 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK: ECCV, 2020.
    [5]
    BHATTACHARYYA P, HUANG C, CZARNECKI K. Ssl-lanes: self-supervised learning for motion forecasting in autonomous driving[C]. Conference on Robot Learning, Seoul, Korea: PMLR, 2023.
    [6]
    ZHOU Z, YE L, WANG J, et al. Hivt: hierarchical vector transformer for multi-agent motion prediction[C]. The IEEE/ CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, USA : IEEE, 2022.
    [7]
    FAHMY H M, ABD EL GHANY M A, BAUMANN G. Vehicle risk assessment and control for lane-keeping and collision avoidance at low-speed and high-speed scenarios[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2018, 67 (6): 4806-4818. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2807796
    [8]
    WU B, YAN Y, NI D, et al. A longitudinal car-following risk assessment model based on risk field theory for autonomous vehicles[J]. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2021, 10(1): 60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ijtst.2020.05.005
    [9]
    CHIA W M D, KEOH S L, MICHALA A L, et al. Real-time recursive risk assessment framework for autonomous vehicle operations[C]. 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring), Helsinki, Finland: IEEE, 2021.
    [10]
    王建强, 吴剑, 李洋. 基于人-车-路协同的行车风险场概念、原理及建模[J]. 中国公路学报, 2016(1): 105-114.

    WANG J Q, WU J, LI Y. Concept, principle and modeling of driving risk field based on driver-vehicle-road interaction[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2016(1): 105-114. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    LI L, GAN J, ZHOU K, et al. A novel lane-changing model of connected and automated vehicles: using the safety potential field theory[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 559: 125039. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.125039
    [12]
    田野, 裴华鑫, 晏松, 等. 车路协同环境下行车风险场模型的扩展与应用[J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2022 (3): 447-457.

    TIAN Y, PEI H X, YAN S, et al. Extended driving risk field model for i-VICS and its application[J]. Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology), 2022(3): 447-457. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    KATRAKAZAS C, QUDDUS M, CHEN W H. A new integrated collision risk assessment methodology for autonomous vehicles[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 127: 61-79.
    [14]
    LEDENT P, PAIGWAR A, RENZAGLIA A, et al. Formal validation of probabilistic collision risk estimation for autonomous driving[C]. 9th IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent SystemsRobotics, Automation and Mechatronics(RAM), Bangkok, Thailand: IEEE, 2019.
    [15]
    STRICKLAND M, FAINEKOS G, AMOR H B. Deep predictive models for collision risk assessment in autonomous driving[C]. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation(ICRA), Brisbane, Australia: IEEE, 2018.
    [16]
    汪磊, 李蕊君, 王菲茵. 基于QAR数据与互信息法的进近风险评估模型[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(4): 21-29, 41. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.003

    WANG Q, LI R J, WANG F Y. Approach risk assessment model based on QAR data and mutual information method[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 21-29, 41. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.003
    [17]
    赵睿, 李云, 胡宏宇, 等. 基于V2I通信的交叉口车辆碰撞预警方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(4): 1019-1029.

    ZHAO R, LI Y, HU H Y, et al. Vehicle collision warning method at intersection based on V2I communication[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering Science), 2023, 53(4): 1019-1029. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    KRAMER B, NEUROHR C, BÜKER M, et al. Identification and quantification of hazardous scenarios for automated driving[C]. 7th International Symposium on Model-based Safety and assessment. Cham, Germany: Springer International Publishing, 2020.
    [19]
    CHANG M F, LAMBERT J, SANGKLOY P, et al. Argoverse: 3D tracking and forecasting with rich maps[C]. The IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Long Beach, USA: IEEE, 2019.
    [20]
    YE M, CAO T, CHEN Q. Tpcn: temporal point cloud net-works for motion forecasting[C]. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition: IEEE, 2021.
    [21]
    褚端峰, 彭赛骞, 胡海洋, 等. 预见性驾驶风险场模型[J]. 机械工程学报, 2024, 60(10): 160-170.

    CHU D F, PENG S Q, HU H Y, et al. Predictive driving risk field model[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 60(10): 160-170. (in Chinese)
    [22]
    LOPEZ A, PABLO, BEHRISCH, et al. Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo[C]. 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, Hawaii, USA: IEEE, 2018.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(14)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (30) PDF downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return