Volume 43 Issue 1
Feb.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Haijian, YANG Silu, LI Yuxuan, ZHAO Xiaohua, CHEN Yan. A Review of the Ethical Dilemmas of Driverless Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.01.001
Citation: LI Haijian, YANG Silu, LI Yuxuan, ZHAO Xiaohua, CHEN Yan. A Review of the Ethical Dilemmas of Driverless Vehicles[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2025, 43(1): 1-14. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.01.001

A Review of the Ethical Dilemmas of Driverless Vehicles

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2025.01.001
  • Received Date: 2024-10-27
    Available Online: 2025-06-27
  • With the rapid advancement of autonomous driving technology, it has demonstrated tremendous potential in enhancing traffic efficiency and safety. However, the ethical issues it raises are becoming increasingly prominent, gradually emerging as a significant constraint to its widespread adoption. This paper aims to explore the core ethical dilemmas in the development of autonomous vehicles from the perspectives of moral philosophy and institutional governance. It focuses on three major areas: algorithmic ethics, social ethics, and legal regulation, covering key topics such as moral decision-making based on utilitarianism and deontology, mechanisms for attributing accident responsibility, and global and domestic legal responses. In terms of algorithmic ethics, utilitarian and deontological approaches, including collision algorithms and moral knobs, offer solutions for ethical conflicts. Regarding responsibility attribution, the traditional human-centered liability model is evolving into a chain-based framework encompassing all stakeholders engaged in designing, producing, and operating autonomous vehicles. As for legal regulation, current legal frameworks suffer from both applicability limitations and regulatory gaps, necessitating the construction of a legal framework that aligns with technological advancements. Future research may further deepen interdisciplinary collaboration and propose more practical solutions in areas such as ethical modeling, responsibility delineation, and institutional design, providing robust ethical support for the safe and sustainable deployment of autonomous vehicles at various levels of automation.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    景鹏, 王伟, 吴麟麟. 老年人对自动驾驶汽车接受度研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(6): 158-171.

    JING P, WANG W, WU L L. Research on the elderly's acceptance of autonomous vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(6): 158-171. (in Chinese)
    [2]
    中国新闻网. 世卫组织: 全球每年有135万人因交通事故死亡[EB/OL]. (2018-12-07)[2024-03-20]. https://www.sohu.com/a/280453755_420076, 2018-12-07.

    China News Network. WHO: 1.35 million people die from traffic accidents worldwide every year[EB/OL]. (2018-12-07)[2024-03-20]. https://www.sohu.com/a/280453755_420076, 2018-12-07. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    WANG H, HUANG Y J, KHAJEPOUR A, et al. Ethical decision-making platform in autonomous vehicles with lexico-graphic optimization based model predictive Controller[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(8): 8164-8175. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.2996954
    [4]
    郭延永, 刘佩, 袁泉, 等. 网联自动驾驶车辆道路交通安全研究综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2023, 23(5): 19-38.

    GUO Y Y, LIU P, YUAN Q, et al. Review of research on road traffic safety of Internet connected autonomous vehicles[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2023, 23(5): 19-38. (in Chinese)
    [5]
    胡兵. 无人驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任承担机制研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019.

    HU B. Research on the tort liability mechanism for driverless vehicle traffic accidents[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [6]
    STILGOE J. Machine learning, autonomy, and the regulation of vehicles: a case study of Waymo[J]. AI and Society, 2021, 36: 637-645. doi: 10.1007/s00146-021-01173-5
    [7]
    张武举, 胡泽恩. 自动驾驶汽车两难伦理困境应对方案研究[J]. 河南警察学院学报, 2020, 29(6): 75-86.

    ZHANG W J, HU Z E. Research on the solutions to the ethical dilemma of autonomous vehicle[J]. Journal of Henan Police Academy, 2020, 29(6): 75-86. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    陈禹衡. 算法优化语境下自动驾驶汽车交通肇事的困境纾解[J]. 苏州大学学报(法学版), 2021, 8(3): 60-73.

    CHEN Y H. Predicament relief of autonomous vehicle traffic accidents in the context of algorithm optimization[J]. Journal of Suzhou University(Law Edition), 2021, 8(3): 60-73. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    朱冰, 贾士政, 赵健, 等. 自动驾驶车辆决策与规划研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2024, 37(1): 215-240.

    ZHU B, JIA S Z, ZHAO J, et al. Review on decision and planning of autonomous vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2024, 37(1): 215-240. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    汪钰庚. 算法的伦理问题研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2019.

    WANG Y G. Research on ethical issues of algorithms[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    谭艳, 何礼广. 自动驾驶汽车的道德算法该如何设计[J]. 绵阳师范学院学报, 2019, 38(7): 5-9.

    TAN Y, HE L G. How to design the moral algorithm of autonomous vehicle[J]. Journal of Mianyang Normal University, 2019, 38(7): 5-9. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    田家赫. 基于道德原则的自动驾驶汽车决策方法[D]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学, 2022.

    TIAN J H. Decision making method of autonomous vehicle based on moral principles[D]. Beijing: People's Public Security University of China, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    隋婷婷, 张学义. 功利主义在无人驾驶设计中的道德算法困境[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2021, 37(10): 112-117.

    SUI T T, ZHANG X Y. The moral algorithm dilemma of utilitarianism in autonomous driving design[J]. Research on Dialectics of Nature, 2021, 37(10): 112-117. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    ANDOW J. Epistemic deontology, epistemic trade-offs, and Kant's formula of humanity[J]. Synthese, 2023, 201(2): 119-138.
    [15]
    GOGOLL J, MULLER J F. Autonomous cars: in favor of a mandatory ethics setting[J]. Science and Engineering Ethics, 2017, 23(3): 681-700.
    [16]
    KARNOUSKOS S. Self-driving car acceptance and the role of ethics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2018, 67(2): 1-14.
    [17]
    BECHTEL W, ABRAHAMSEN A. mental mechanisms, autonomous systems, and moral agency[J]. Proceedings of the Annu-al Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Nashville: Cognitive Science Society, 2007.
    [18]
    MILLAR J. Anethical dilemma: When robot cars must kill, who should pick the victim?[J/OL]. (2014-06-01)[2024-03-20]. https://robohub.org/an-ethical-dilemma-when-robot-cars-mu-st-kill-who-should-pick-the-victim/.
    [19]
    孙保学. 自动驾驶汽车事故的道德算法由谁来决定[J]. 伦理学研究, 2018, 94(2): 97-101.

    SUN B X. Who decides the moral algorithm of autonomous vehicle accidents[J]. Studies in Ethics, 2018, 94(2): 97-101. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    张学义, 王晓雪. "伦理旋钮": 破解无人驾驶算法困境的密钥?[J]. 中国人民大学学报, 2023, 37(2): 73-82.

    ZHANG X Y, WANG X X". Ethical knob": the key to solving the dilemma of autonomous driving algorithms?[J]. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2023, 37(2): 73-82. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    FUREY H, HILL S. Correction to: MIT's moral machine project is a psychological roadblock to self-driving cars[J]. AI and Ethics, 2020, 1(2): 157.
    [22]
    GERDES J C, THORNTON S M. Implementable ethics for autonomous vehicles[J/OL]. (2016-05-22)[2024-03-20]. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-48847-8_5.
    [23]
    于涵. 自动驾驶汽车的道德算法设计——1种风险分配立场[J]. 天府新论, 2021, 220(4): 101-108.

    YU H. Moral algorithm design of autonomous vehicle: a risk allocation position[J]. A New Discussion on Tian-fu, 2021, 220(4): 101-108. (in Chinese)
    [24]
    MAXIMILIAN G, FRANZISKA P, MARKUS L. An ethical trajectory planning algorithm for autonomous vehicles[J]. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2023, 5(2): 137-144.
    [25]
    DEREK L. A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous Vehicles[J/ OL]. (2017-03-04)[2024-03-20]. https://link.springer.com/ar-ticle/10.1007/s10676-017-9419-3.
    [26]
    余露. 自动驾驶汽车的罗尔斯式算法——"最大化最小值"原则能否作为"电车难题"的道德决策原则[J]. 哲学动态, 2019(10): 100-107.

    YU L. Can the rawls algorithm of autonomous vehicle: the principle of "maximizing the minimum value" be used as the moral decision principle of "tram problem"[J]. Philosophical dynamics, 2019(10): 100-107. (in Chinese)
    [27]
    LI Y, KUMAR R, LASECKI W S, et al. Artificial intelli-gence for HCI: a modern approach[C]. Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, USA: ACE, 2020.
    [28]
    于文娟. 面向伦理困境的无人驾驶汽车决策研究[D]. 南昌: 南昌大学, 2023.

    YU W J. Research on decision making of driverless vehicles faced with ethical dilemmas[D]. Nanchang: Nanchang University, 2023. (in Chinese)
    [29]
    ANDERSON M, ANDERSON S L. Machine ethics: creating an ethical intelligent agent[J]. AI Magazine, 2007, 28(4): 15-25.
    [30]
    陆春意, 何赏璐, 高彬彬, 等. 基于博弈论的自动驾驶驶离专用车道换道决策模型[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(4): 144-153, 174. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.016

    LU C Y, HE S L, GAO B B, et al. Lane change decision model of automatic driving leaving the exclusive lane based on game theory[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(4): 144-153, 174. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.04.016
    [31]
    李硕. 自动驾驶汽车交通事故侵权的责任认定[J]. 学习与实践, 2022, 465(11): 85-91.

    LI S. Determination of liability for infringement of autonomous vehicle traffic accidents[J]. Learning and Prac-tice, 2022, 465(11): 85-91. (in Chinese)
    [32]
    吴泽生. 自动驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任研究[D]. 桂林: 广西师范大学, 2022.

    WU Z S. Research on tort liability of autonomous vehicle traffic accidents[D]. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [33]
    李艳坤. 无人驾驶汽车之伦理辨析[J]. 时代汽车, 2021, 369 (21): 7-8, 42.

    LI Y K. Ethical analysis of driverless car[J]. Era Automobile, 2021, 369(21): 7-8, 42. (in Chinese)
    [34]
    文佳慧. 自动驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任主体研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃政法大学, 2022.

    WEN J H. Research on the subject of tort liability in traffic accidents of autonomous vehicle[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu University of Political Science and Law, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [35]
    丁久辉, 何国力. 关于中国无人驾驶车辆事故责任主体划分的思考[J]. 科技视界, 2017, 187(1): 119-120.

    DING J H, HE G L. Reflection on the division of responsibil-ity subjects for driverless vehicle accidents in China[J]. Technology Perspective, 2017, 187(1): 119-120. (in Chinese)
    [36]
    彭媛. 自动驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任主体研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.

    PENG Y. Research on the subject of tort liability in traffic accidents of autonomous vehicle[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021. (in Chinese)
    [37]
    包杨菲. 无人驾驶汽车交通事故侵权责任研究[J]. 秦智, 2022, 15(9): 19-21.

    BAO Y F. Research on tort liability for driverless vehicle traffic accidents[J]. Insight·Shaanxi, 2022, 15(9): 19-21(. in Chi-nese)
    [38]
    陈陆. 中国自动驾驶汽车事故侵权责任研究[D]. 上海: 上海师范大学, 2019.

    CHEN L. Research on tort liability of autonomous vehicle accidents in China[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Normal University, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [39]
    李芳, 裴彧, 徐峰, 等. 自动驾驶汽车的五大伦理问题与原则的思考[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2020, 35(10): 36-45.

    LI F, PEI Y, XU F, et al. Thoughts on the five ethical issues and principles of autonomous vehicle[J]. Global Technology and Economic Outlook, 2020, 35(10): 36-45. (in Chinese)
    [40]
    李姗姗. 自动驾驶汽车侵权责任研究[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2022, 688(17): 178-182.

    LI S S. Research on tort liability of autonomous vehicle[J]. Cooperative Economy and Technology, 2022, 688(17): 178-182. (in Chinese)
    [41]
    杜严勇. 机器人伦理中的道德责任问题研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2017, 35(11): 1608-1613.

    DU Y Y. Research on moral responsibility in robot ethics[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2017, 35(11): 1608-1613. (in Chinese)
    [42]
    袁曾. 无人驾驶汽车侵权责任的链式分配机制——以算法应用为切入点[J]. 东方法学, 2019, 71(5): 28-39.

    YUAN Z. The chain allocation mechanism of tort liability for driverless vehicles: starting from the application of algo-rithms[J]. Oriental Law, 2019, 71(5): 28-39. (in Chinese)
    [43]
    唐立, 卿三东, 徐志刚, 等. 自动驾驶公众接受度研究综述[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2020, 20(2): 131-146.

    TANG L, QING S D, XU Z G, et al. Research review on public acceptance of autonomous driving[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20(2): 131-146. (in Chinese)
    [44]
    郑志峰. 自动驾驶汽车的私法挑战与应对研究[M]. 北京: 中国法制出版社, 2022.

    ZHENG Z F. Research on private law challenges and coun-termeasures of autonomous vehicle[M]. Beijing: China Legal Publishing House, 2022. (in Chinese)
    [45]
    郑戈. 数据法治与未来交通——自动驾驶汽车数据治理刍议[J]. 中国法律评论, 2022, 43(1): 202-214.

    ZHENG G. Data rule of law and future traffic - on data governance of autonomous vehicle[J]. Chinese Legal Review, 2022, 43(1): 202-214. (in Chinese)
    [46]
    唐兴华, 郭喨, 唐解云. 电车难题、隐私保护与自动驾驶[J]. 华东理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 34(6): 73-79.

    TANG X H, GUO L, TANG J Y. Tram challenges, privacy protection, and autonomous driving[J]. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition), 2019, 34(6): 73-79. (in Chinese)
    [47]
    LIM HSM, TAEIHAGH A. Autonomous vehicles for smart and sustainable cities: an in-depth exploration of privacy and cyber-security implications[J]. Energies. 2018, 11(5): 1062.
    [48]
    YE X, ZHOU J, LI Y D, et al. a location privacy protection scheme for convoy driving in autonomous driving era[J]. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications. 2021, 14(3): 1-13.
    [49]
    LAI C Z, LI G J, ZHENG D. SPSC: a secure and privacy-preserving autonomous platoon setup and communication scheme[J]. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies. 2021, 32(9): e3982.
    [50]
    ADEBOYE O, DARGAHI T, BABAIE M, et al. Deepclean: a robust deep learning technique for autonomous vehicle camera data privacy[J/OL]. (2022-11-17)[2024-03-20]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9954019.
    [51]
    XIONG Z B, CAI Z P, HAN Q L, et al. ADGAN: protect your location privacy in camera data of auto-driving vehicles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2021, 17(9): 6200-6210.
    [52]
    PAREKH R, PATEL N, GUPTA R, et al. GeFL: gradient encryption-aided privacy preserved federated learning for autonomous vehicles[J/OL]. (2023-01-03)[2024-03-20]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10005165.
    [53]
    BEEDE D, POWERS R, INGRAM C. The employment impact of autonomous vehicles [EB/OL](. 2021-04-20)[2024-03-20]. https://www.commerce.gov/data-and-reports/reports/2017/08/employment-impact-autonomous-vehicles, 2021-04-20.
    [54]
    徐祥运, 赵燕楠. 无人驾驶汽车技术的社会影响及其应对策略[J]. 学术交流, 2021, 324(3): 134-148, 192.

    XU X Y, ZHAO Y N. The social impact of driverless vehicle technology and its response strategies[J]. Academic Exchange, 2021, 324(3): 134-148, 192. (in Chinese)
    [55]
    李芳, 江菲菲, 刘鑫怡, 等. 自动驾驶汽车的伦理、法律与社会影响研究[J]. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2021, 36(7): 53-60.

    LI F, JIANG F F, LIU X Y, et al. Research on ethics, law and social impact of autonomous vehicle[J]. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2021, 36(7): 53-60. (in Chinese)
    [56]
    KAPLAN S, GORDON B, EL Z F, et al. The future of autonomous vehicles: lessons from the literature on technology adoption[J]. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 2019, 41(4): 583-597.
    [57]
    贾开, 赵彩莲. 智能驾驶汽车产业的治理: 发展、规制与公共政策选择[J]. 电子政务, 2018(3): 12-21.

    JIA K, ZHAO C L. Governance of the intelligent driving vehicle industry: development, regulation, and public policy choices[J]. E-government, 2018(3): 12-21. (in Chinese)
    [58]
    朱仕杰. 自动驾驶汽车致害的侵权法律规制研究[D]. 武汉: 华中师范大学, 2018.

    ZHU S J. Research on legal regulation of tort caused by autonomous vehicle[D]. Wuhan: Central China Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [59]
    吴浩伟. 域外自动驾驶汽车侵权责任的立法比较和启示[J]. 南海法学, 2021, 5(5): 117-124.

    WU H W. Legislative comparison and enlightenment on tort liability of autonomous vehicle outside China[J]. South China Sea Law, 2021, 5(5): 117-124. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (46) PDF downloads(4) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return