Volume 42 Issue 6
Dec.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YANG Jun, LIU Haoran, WU Renbiao, WANG Feiyin. A Risk Assessment Method for Civil Aviation Passengers Based on The Fusion of Multi-risk Factors[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(6): 31-41. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.06.004
Citation: YANG Jun, LIU Haoran, WU Renbiao, WANG Feiyin. A Risk Assessment Method for Civil Aviation Passengers Based on The Fusion of Multi-risk Factors[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(6): 31-41. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.06.004

A Risk Assessment Method for Civil Aviation Passengers Based on The Fusion of Multi-risk Factors

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.06.004
  • Received Date: 2024-07-22
    Available Online: 2025-03-08
  • Civil aviation passengers are the main implementers of civil aviation security measures. Therefore, in order to accurately assess the risk level of civil aviation passengers, a civil aviation passenger risk assessment method based on the fusion of multi-risk factors is proposed. The risk factors associated with passengers are identified through statistical analysis, regulation and expert investigation. According to the characteristics, the risk factors associated with passengers are categorized into three main parts: possibility, hazard and severity. Combined with the control measures, a risk index system for civil aviation passengers based on multi-risk factors is constructed, which contains 7 first-level indicators and 18 second-level indicators. The interval analytic hierarchy process can fully account for the uncertainty and fuzziness of expert judgments, while the set value statistics method allows for the quantitative representation of fuzzy indicators. By combining the advantages of these two methods, a quantitative analysis method based on the combination of internal analytic hierarchy process and set value statistics method are applied to calculate the weight coefficients of the risk indicators. To meet practical application requirements, passenger security data are collected throughout the passenger journey. And a risk assessment method for civil aviation passengers, based on the fusion of multi-risk factors, is proposed to enable dynamic quantitative risk assessments throughout the entire process. The proposed method is validated using a constructed validation dataset. The experimental results show that the recall rate for high-risk passengers reached 92%, with no high-risk passengers being assessed as low risk. The recall rate for medium-risk passengers reached 96%, with only 2% of medium-risk passengers assessed as low risk. The recall rate for low-risk passengers also reached 96%, with no low-risk passengers assessed as high risk. The proposed method enables a dynamic quantification assessment of civil aviation passenger risks, effectively integrating expert knowledge and indicator characteristics. This provides a theoretical foundation for a more comprehensive, rational, and scientifically-driven analysis of risks associated with civil aviation passengers.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    IATA. IATA annual review 2021[R/OL]. (2022-03-29)[2024-07-14] https://www.iata.org/contentassets/c81222d96c9a4e0bb4ff6ced0126f0bb/iata-annual-review-2021.pdf.
    [2]
    International Civil Aviation Organization. Global aviation safety plan (2023-2025)[R/OL]. (2022-12-20) [2024-07-14] https://www.icao.int/safety/GASP/Documents/10004_zh.pdf.
    [3]
    MCLAY L A, LEE A J, JACOBSON S H. Risk-based policies for airport security checkpoint screening[J]. Transportation science, 2010, 44(3): 333-349. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0308
    [4]
    HUANG P, LUH H., ZHANG Z G. A queueing model for tiered inspection lines in airports[J]. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 2016, 27(2): 147-177.
    [5]
    ZHENG Y J, SHENG W G, SUN X M, et al. Airline passenger profiling based on fuzzy deep machine learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning System, 2017, 28(12): 2911-2923. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2609437
    [6]
    冯文刚, 姜兆菲璠. 基于民航旅客分级分类方法的差异化安检和旅客风险演化研究[J]. 数据分析与知识发现, 2020, 4 (12): 105-119. doi: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0655

    FENG W G, JIANG Z F F. Improving security checks and passenger risk evaluation with classification of airline passengers[J]. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 2020, 4(12): 105-119. (in Chinese) doi: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2020.0655
    [7]
    ALBERT L A, NIKOLAEV A, LEE A J, et al. A review of risk-based security and its impact on TSA PreCheck[J]. ⅡSE Trans. 2020(53): 657-670.
    [8]
    吴仁彪, 张妍, 贾云飞, 等. 基于背景审查的旅客风险分级[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021(2): 713-712.

    WU R B, ZHANG Y, JIA Y F, et al. Classification of the passengers'risk based on their background screening[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021(2): 713-712. (in Chinese)
    [9]
    吴仁彪, 何宇翔, 贾云飞. 基于改进层次分析法的重点人员风险评价方法[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2021, 31(10): 112-118.

    WU R B, HE Y X, JIA Y F. Key personnel risk assessment method based on improved AHP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2021, 31(10): 112-118. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    ZHOU H, XUE Y T, JIANG Z Q, et al. An assessment model for air passenger risk classification[J]. Applied Scienc-es-Basel, 2022, 19(12): 9580.
    [11]
    吴仁彪, 刘洋, 贾云飞, 等. 基于改进XGBoost的民航重点旅客风险评估方法[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2023, 23(3): 651-658.

    WU R B, LIU Y, JIA Y F, et al. Risk assessment method for key civil aviation passengers based on improved XG-Boost[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2023, 23(3): 651-658. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    赵振武, 李雪琴, 贾朋霖. 融合贝叶斯优化随机森林的机场旅客风险评估研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(9): 3487-3495.

    ZHAO Z W, LI X Q, JIA P L. Research on airport passenger risk assessment by fusing bayesian optimized random forest[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2024, 24(9): 3487-3495. (in Chinese)
    [13]
    汪磊, 梁妍, 张楠, 等. 民航典型安保突发事件统计分析与防控策略[J]. 安全, 2022, 43(7): 13-19.

    WANG L, LIANG Y, ZHANG N, et al. Statistical analysis and prevention and control strategies of typical emergeney in civil aviation safety & security[J]. Safety & Security, 2022, 43(7): 13-19. (in Chinese)
    [14]
    陈晓薇, 张希, 王增录, 等. 基于组合赋权-灰云模型的高速公路隧道施工安全韧性评估方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2024, 42(3): 158-166. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.017

    CHEN X W, ZHANG X, WANG Z L, et al. A method for safety resilience evaluation of construction of freeway tunnels based on combination weighting and grey cloud model[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(3): 158-166. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.03.017
    [15]
    李振龙, 潘梦妞, 曲彦菘, 等. 基于IAHP-EWM-LDM的L3级自动驾驶接管过程安全性评价方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41(4): 14-23, 100. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.04.002

    LI Z L, PAN M N, QU Y S, et al. A method for evaluating the safety over the takeover process of the level 3 automated vehicles based on IAHP-EWM-LDM[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(4): 14-23, 100. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.04.002
    [16]
    翟芸, 胡冰, 施端阳. 基于区间层次分析法和Vague集的雷达装备可靠性评估[J]. 探测与控制学报, 2023, 45(3): 81-88.

    ZHAI Y, HU B, SHI D Y. Radar equipment reliability evaluation based on improved AHP and vague set[J]. Journal of Detection & Control, 2023, 45(3): 81-88. (in Chinese)
    [17]
    艾春安, 奉非东, 李剑, 等. 基于区间数判断矩阵与模糊聚类分析的主观群决策AHP方法[J]. 决策与统计, 2019(2): 39-43.

    AI C A, FENG F D, LI J, et al. AHP method of subjective group decision-making based on interval number judgment matrix and fuzzy clustering analysis[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2019(2): 39-43. (in Chinese)
    [18]
    任娟娟, 刘宽, 王伟华, 等. 基于区间层次分析的CRTS Ⅲ型板式无砟轨道开裂状况评估[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(12): 2267-2274. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.12.006

    REN J J, LIU K, WANG W H, et al. Evaluation of cracking condition for CRTS Ⅲ prefabricated slab track based on interval analytic hierarchy process[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2021, 55(12): 2267-2274. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-973X.2021.12.006
    [19]
    王志亮, 吴兵, 邢书仁, 等. 模糊集值统计法在煤矿安全评价指标权值中的应用[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2004, 14(1): 71-73.

    WANG Z L, WU B, XING S R, et al. Application of fuzzy centralization statistical method in weighted index value of coal mine safety assessment[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2004, 14(1): 71-73. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    张华, 鞠兴军, 张津鹏, 等. 基于模糊综合-集值统计法的露天煤矿爆破安全风险评价[J]. 工业安全与环境, 2024, 50 (4): 50-54.

    ZHANG H, JU X J, ZHANG J P, et al. Safety risk assessment of open pit coal mine blasting based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and set value statistics[J]. Industrial Safty and Environmental Protectiong, 2024, 50(4): 50-54. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(2)  / Tables(11)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (106) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return