Volume 42 Issue 5
Oct.  2024
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WEI Wei, ZHENG Lai, JIAO Hansheng. Deep Learning Prediction of Expressway Traffic Conflicts Based on The Encoder-Decoder Architecture[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(5): 1-13. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.05.001
Citation: WEI Wei, ZHENG Lai, JIAO Hansheng. Deep Learning Prediction of Expressway Traffic Conflicts Based on The Encoder-Decoder Architecture[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2024, 42(5): 1-13. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.05.001

Deep Learning Prediction of Expressway Traffic Conflicts Based on The Encoder-Decoder Architecture

doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2024.05.001
  • Received Date: 2023-12-06
    Available Online: 2025-01-22
  • The approach aims to uncover the relationship between dynamic traffic parameters and traffic conflict incidents and it further supports proactive safety control. The highD database is utilized to create sample data in 3-minute intervals, extracting 23 features related to traffic flow and road section characteristics. Based on the post encroachment time(PET)indicator, different thresholds are set to classify the severity of conflicts during car-following and lane-changing scenarios. The random forest regression(RFR)method is used to select the most critical features, while feature matrix to gray image(FM2GI)technology converts the sample data into grayscale images to enable 2D convolution to extract image features. Three encoder-decoder models, convolutional neural networks (CNN), C-RFR, and C-SVR are compared with baseline models (back propagation neural network (BPNN), RFR, and support vector regression(SVR). The results indicated that: based on two key features(the number of vehicles entering and exiting the road section)and five effective features(average headway, time occupancy, average driving speed of passenger cars, lane change rate, and variance of exit speeds), the CNN, C-RFR, and C-SVR models within the encoder-decoder framework outperformed the baseline models. Specifically, root mean squared error(RMSE)reduced by 12. 6%, 31. 6%, and 18. 5%, respectively, enabling real-time prediction of traffic conflicts. Among them, CNN exhibited the lowest prediction error and demonstrated strong robustness in predicting traffic conflicts of varying severities, along with low sensitivity to two key parameters. The CNN, C-RFR, and C-SVR models, utilizing FM2GI technology and 2D convolution encoding, expand the deep learning framework for traffic conflict prediction modeling, and achieve reliable predictions for multiple severities of highway traffic conflicts in basic road segments.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZHENG L, ISMAIL K, SAYED T, et al. Bivariate extreme value modeling for road safety estimation[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2018, 120: 83-91.
    [2]
    公安部交通管理局. 道路交通事故统计年报[R]. 北京: 公安部交通管理局, 2019.

    Ministry of Public Security, Transportation Bureau. The road traffic accidents statistics report in China[R]. Beijing: Ministry of Public Security, Transportation bureau, 2019. (in Chinese)
    [3]
    孟祥海, 张晓明, 郑来. 基于线形与交通状态的山区高速公路追尾事故预测[J]. 中国公路学报, 2012, 25(4): 113-118. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2012.04.019

    MENG X H, ZHANG X M, ZHENG L, Prediction of rear-end collision on mountainous expressway based on geometric alignment and traffic conditions[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2012, 25(4): 113-118. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2012.04.019
    [4]
    高雪林, 汤厚骏, 沈佳平, 等. 基于XGBoost的高速公路事故类型及严重程度预测方法[J]. 交通信息与安全, 2023, 41 (4): 55-63. doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.04.006

    GAO X L, TANG H J, SHEN J P, et al. A method for predicting the type and severity of freeway accidents based on XGBoost[J]. Journal of Transport Information and Safety, 2023, 41(4): 55-63. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3963/j.jssn.1674-4861.2023.04.006
    [5]
    马聪, 张生瑞, 马壮林, 等. 高速公路交通事故非线性负二项预测模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(11): 176-185. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.11.019

    MA C, ZHANG S R, MA Z L, et al. Nonlinear negative binomial regression model of expressway traffic accident frequency prediction[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(11): 176-185. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.11.019
    [6]
    ZHENG L, SAYED T, MANNERING F. Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: a review of analytic methods and future directions[J]. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 2021, 29: 100142. doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2020.100142
    [7]
    朱顺应, 蒋若曦, 王红, 等. 机动车交通冲突技术研究综述[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(2): 15-33.

    ZHU S Y, JIANG R X, WANG H, et al. Review of research on traffic conflict techniques[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(2): 15-33. (in Chinese)
    [8]
    郑来, 侯芹忠, 郭延永, 等. 高速公路合流区冲突极值建模与交通事故预测[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39(10): 132-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2022.10.017

    ZHENG L, HOU Q Z, GUO Y Y, et al. Conflict extremum modeling and traffic accident prediction for expressway merging areas[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2022, 39(10): 132-140. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2022.10.017
    [9]
    郑来, 邓晓庆, 孟祥海. 基于PET极值统计的高速公路车道变换行为安全性研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2016, 33(8): 120-126.

    ZHENG L, DENG X Q. MENG X H. Study on safety of lane changing behaviours on expressway based on PET extreme statistics[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2016, 33(8): 120-126. (in Chinese)
    [10]
    孟祥海, 林兰平. 高速公路分合流区潜在事故风险研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(8): 164-170.

    MEGN X H, LIN L P. Research on potential crash risk in freeway merging and diverging areas[J]. China Safety Science Journal. 2015, 25(8): 164-170. (in Chinese)
    [11]
    马艳丽, 祁首铭, 吴昊天, 等. 基于PET算法的匝道合流区交通冲突识别模型[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18 (2): 142-148.

    MA Y L, QI S M, WU H T, et al., Traffic conflicts identification model based on post encroachment time algorithm in ramp merging area[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18(2): 142-148. (in Chinese)
    [12]
    戢晓峰, 谢世坤, 覃文文, 等. 基于轨迹数据的山区危险性弯道路段交通事故风险动态预测[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(4): 277-285. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.04.023

    JI X F, XIE S K, QIN W W, et al. Dynamic prediction of traffic accident risk in risky curve sections based on vehicle trajectory data[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(4): 277-285. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2022.04.023
    [13]
    SUN Y, MALLICK T, BALAPRAKASH P, et al. A data-centric weak supervised learning for highway traffic incident detection[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022, 176: 106779.
    [14]
    ARVIN R, KHATTAK A J, QI H. Safety critical event prediction through unified analysis of driver and vehicle volatilities: Application of deep learning methods[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 151: 105949.
    [15]
    ZHENG L, HU Z L, SAYED T. Traffic conflict prediction at signal cycle level using Bayesian optimized machine learning approaches[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022, 2677(5): 183-195.
    [16]
    KRAJEWSKI R, BOCK J, KLOEKER L, et al. The highD dataset: a drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on German highways for validation of highly automated driving systems[C]. 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Maui, HI, USA: IEEE, 2018.
    [17]
    ESSA M, SAYED T. Full Bayesian conflict-based models for real time safety evaluation of signalized intersections[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2019, 129: 367-381.
    [18]
    GROMPING, U. Variable importance assessment in regression: linear regression versus random forest[J]. The American Statistician, 2009, 63(4), 308-319.
    [19]
    翁剑成, 孙宇星, 孔宁, 等. 基于多源数据的公交专用道效能评价方法与影响模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(4): 267-276.

    WENG J C, SUN Y X, KONG N, et al. Evaluation method and influence model of bus lane performance based on multi-source data[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(4): 267-276. (in Chinese)
    [20]
    司伟, 茆纬杰, 李宁, 等. 寒区沥青路面智慧化施工混合料温度预估机器学习模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2023, 36(3): 81-97.

    SI W, MAO W J, LI N, et al. Research on machine learning model for temperature prediction of asphalt mixture in intelligent construction of asphalt pavement in cold regions[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2023, 36(3): 81-97. (in Chinese)
    [21]
    ZHENG Q K, XU C C, LIU P, et al. Investigating the predictability of crashes on different freeway segments using the real-time crash risk models[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 159: 106213.
    [22]
    赵炜华, 刘浩学, 赵建有, 等. 基于BP神经网络的驾驶员昼夜动态空间距离判识规律[J]. 中国公路学报, 2010, 23(2): 92-98.

    ZHAO W H, LIU H X, ZHAO J Y, et al. Law of BP neural network-based space distance cognition of driver in dynamic environment at day and night[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2010, 23(2): 92-98. (in Chinese)
    [23]
    SHARMA A, VANS E, SHIGEMIZU D, et al. DeepInsight: a methodology to transform a non-image data to an image for convolution neural network architecture[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9: 11399.
    [24]
    RAHIM M A, HASSAN H M. A deep learning based traffic crash severity prediction framework[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2021, 154: 106090.
    [25]
    KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84-90.
    [26]
    LI P, ABDEL-ATY M, YUAN J H. Real-time crash risk prediction on arterials based on LSTM-CNN[J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2020, 135: 105371.
    [27]
    WANG H, REN K, SONG J. A closer look at batch size in mini-batch training of deep auto-encoders[C]. 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communications, Chengdu, China: IEEE, 2017.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(20)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (177) PDF downloads(43) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return